Did he also explain why Omega would change the movement for one that was:
1. Not correct for the reference, and
2. 15 years older than the movement that started out in the watch?
You also say:
Is he implying that Omega thought that at that moment in time in the 1970's, in your grandfather's country of residence, that there were too many calibre 321 watches? And for that reason Omega consciously made a decision to replace the movement with a 27CHRO C12?
I find this explanation a little too far fetched to be honest
My biggest doubt would be the question of how on earth would Omega even have a starting point of the number of units of each calibre type per country?
Without knowing the amount of units per calibre per country it would impossible to, "maintain certain amount of movement type per country" as there is an unknown starting point....
Click to expand...