My amazing OB messaged me and said my 321 had arrived! I picked it up today and could not be happier. Beautiful watch, beautifully executed. Feeling lucky and grateful to life to be able to afford such luxuries!
Congrats, wear it in good health. BTW, you blurred out the SN on your lug but left it on the movement. 😉
My 321 was sold in late Jan 2021, and comparing my serial number with yours there is a difference of about 3400, and that's over a 2 3/4 year period, or about 1235 pieces a year in this '88' serial number block. There are some other 321s with a different serial number sequence but it seems they are below their 2,000 target limit which has been the general consensus.
I am happy for you, the long wait has delivered !!
Q Quanj2Congrats on the purchase! It truly is a beautiful piece.
Congrats! Beautiful watch.
Congrats, wear it in good health. BTW, you blurred out the SN on your lug but left it on the movement. 😉
My 321 was sold in late Jan 2021, and comparing my serial number with yours there is a difference of about 3400, and that's over a 2 3/4 year period, or about 1235 pieces a year in this '88' serial number block. There are some other 321s with a different serial number sequence but it seems they are below their 2,000 target limit which has been the general consensus.
The serial numbers I've seen for the 321 movement are generally in the 8870XXXX format and the ones on the Omega website are very low numbers, like 88700017, and field numbers seem to go up in generally increasing order. My Jan 2021 sales watch is just under 0900, the one posted earlier today that was just picked up was in the 4300 range. I've not seen any weird deviation in 321 serial numbers so far. If Omega is randomizing these serial numbers it's pretty subtle.
Why does the 321 have the box that the 1861 had?