foxtrot
·I have promise to myself (7 inches wrist) that I would never by again a watch with skeleton hands, HE valve, above 41mm and thicker than 13mm. Forgive my English writing, please.
So, I get the Nekton!, why? How difficult to answer my own question, where is the hidden power of this watch? such a power that can blew away my pre concepts.
I went to three AD´s separated by 20 min walking, so the walk can calm down enthusiasm.
I try the same watches in the three AD´s, Seamaster diver 300m, the Nekton, Seamaster 300 bronze gold and the new speedmaster 3861 sapphire.
On the firs AD emotions were too strong with the Speedy and the Nekton.
I conclude that I do not like the tone/color of the bronze-gold (I was looking for the blue one, but out of stock). The bracelets on the divers, let me be aggressive, horrendous: non tapering, adds a lot of weight to the watch and the 90´s design too complex too much elements.
I still can´t believe how comfortable is the new speedy (in leather strap), sincerely can´t understand how they do it, where is the trick. The Nekton was so aesthetically pleasant that I need to calm down and walk to the next AD.
Second AD: test the same watches, but in the walk, I decided it must be a diver, I will buy that speedy for sure in the future (I have a speedy Schumacher already, smaller but more uncomfortable).
I focused on the divers, and again the Nekton grows and grows, all the doubts about the bezel becomes positive things. Again, I do not like the bronze tone of the 300, this watch in the blue version would complicate my already altered feelings. In this second trial I confirm that the Nekton was comfortable and correct size, my biggest warm. I reconfirm that the standard diver (in black) has too many shining all around, the ceramic bezels shines, the white numbers IMO have too much presence, the dial shines…as I can´t read the date without glasses is a not useful feature, breaks the symmetry and maybe the harmony of the dial.
A walk of 20 minutes to the third AD (OB): test them all. They let me go outside to the natural light to check the Nekton and its bezel, uff, what a watch!
Has the Nekton cheat me? hypnotize me? how could I lost all my prejudice’s?
An intent to answer:
1. No date is a must
2. The dial is dark grey mate, it becomes grey then can become totally black. The raised waves are polished so they shine (not always!) and adds some ´hypnotic effect´ too the poor observer…me. It is in general a less shining dial.
3. The amount of red is perfect, works!
4. The bezel: well, here we enter in personal taste zone. I like that it is not ceramic that I found too brilliant on the current model and do not like the ´presence´ of the white numbers they have too much protagonist, you are always seeing them. Nekton bezel shines much less, the numbers are more ´integrated´ being same material. The background texture is beautiful, this detail makes me like it more than Yachtmaster or even the AC (Peter Blake) Seamaster’s.
Ok, as this has been written in a first day ownership, all the above is not solid, but I can advise, if you are looking for a diver 300 give a chance to the Nekton.
So, I get the Nekton!, why? How difficult to answer my own question, where is the hidden power of this watch? such a power that can blew away my pre concepts.
I went to three AD´s separated by 20 min walking, so the walk can calm down enthusiasm.
I try the same watches in the three AD´s, Seamaster diver 300m, the Nekton, Seamaster 300 bronze gold and the new speedmaster 3861 sapphire.
On the firs AD emotions were too strong with the Speedy and the Nekton.
I conclude that I do not like the tone/color of the bronze-gold (I was looking for the blue one, but out of stock). The bracelets on the divers, let me be aggressive, horrendous: non tapering, adds a lot of weight to the watch and the 90´s design too complex too much elements.
I still can´t believe how comfortable is the new speedy (in leather strap), sincerely can´t understand how they do it, where is the trick. The Nekton was so aesthetically pleasant that I need to calm down and walk to the next AD.
Second AD: test the same watches, but in the walk, I decided it must be a diver, I will buy that speedy for sure in the future (I have a speedy Schumacher already, smaller but more uncomfortable).
I focused on the divers, and again the Nekton grows and grows, all the doubts about the bezel becomes positive things. Again, I do not like the bronze tone of the 300, this watch in the blue version would complicate my already altered feelings. In this second trial I confirm that the Nekton was comfortable and correct size, my biggest warm. I reconfirm that the standard diver (in black) has too many shining all around, the ceramic bezels shines, the white numbers IMO have too much presence, the dial shines…as I can´t read the date without glasses is a not useful feature, breaks the symmetry and maybe the harmony of the dial.
A walk of 20 minutes to the third AD (OB): test them all. They let me go outside to the natural light to check the Nekton and its bezel, uff, what a watch!
Has the Nekton cheat me? hypnotize me? how could I lost all my prejudice’s?
An intent to answer:
1. No date is a must
2. The dial is dark grey mate, it becomes grey then can become totally black. The raised waves are polished so they shine (not always!) and adds some ´hypnotic effect´ too the poor observer…me. It is in general a less shining dial.
3. The amount of red is perfect, works!
4. The bezel: well, here we enter in personal taste zone. I like that it is not ceramic that I found too brilliant on the current model and do not like the ´presence´ of the white numbers they have too much protagonist, you are always seeing them. Nekton bezel shines much less, the numbers are more ´integrated´ being same material. The background texture is beautiful, this detail makes me like it more than Yachtmaster or even the AC (Peter Blake) Seamaster’s.
Ok, as this has been written in a first day ownership, all the above is not solid, but I can advise, if you are looking for a diver 300 give a chance to the Nekton.