momosono
·definitely 25
I believe it was Archer who that said Omega now demands some old parts when providing watchmakers with new - maybe it was just for signed parts, I don’t recall. So that might be something to be aware of
Omega serial stamping can be very deceptive. It’ll likely be 28m, the 8s often look weird. It can’t be any earlier than 26.55m as otherwise it couldn’t be a 861 and it shouldn’t be 26m on a -69 unless it’s had a bridge or movement swap. If it’s not 28m then something is wrong.
Crazy how the ‘8’ looks like a ‘5’ in the other pics 😵💫
But that once cost me 120 bucks and an extract stating some pimp-of-persia golden-rubee’d watch I most certainly did not have...
I was reading the fine print on the extract from Omega that you were out your money and the extract if the numbers didn't jive.
I'm feeling a little better about a service and an extract after nailing the serial number down.
...and the pictures. My golden-rubee extract was before they changed it, where it was just mandatory to enter a serial number and nothing more. That has changed.
I would say that its all looking good and you should have total peace of mind 👍