Scarecrow Boat
路Just wanted to share my IBM Quarter Century Rolex Datejust 16220. This specific watch was issued to a John A Noid and I have to believe it was stored away from that moment until it was ultimately sold by his family. It was sold as a complete set and was essentially a time capsule from the 90's, which was two years after I was born. Honestly, the entire presentation looked as if Rolex had just sold this piece.
*Don't mind the bracelet changing marks on the back of the lugs. I bought this watch to wear and enjoy 馃榾
It wasn't until much later that I realized the papers included with my watch weren't for my watch but for another 16220 (possible IBM as well) Datejust. With the help of another member, we looked into every IBM Datejust we could find, and found a plausible reason why my papers were incorrect. Every IBM Datejust that we could find, that was pictured with their papers, had the name Michael C Fina stamped on them, which was a jeweler in NY. It's possible the jeweler put the papers in the incorrect box from the get go, but we had a feeling this was accidentally done by IBM when they received and inspected the watch(es). Its all speculation but both of us were confident these papers have lived their entire life with my watch. Like the two brochures, the papers had crisp folded edges that looked to have never been opened. It's a bummer the papers didn't match but to me, these are part of the watch and I really don't mind it.
Initially, I created this thread hoping to reunite these papers with the correct watch, but I went into that experiment knowing it was rather fanciful and unlikely to be successful. Too many variable stacked up against me. I couldn't bring myself to just bin the papers and I curious enough to give it a try. But I guess, if you know someone that has an IBM Quarter Century watch from the 90's that's missing the papers, maybe I have them 馃槈 Until then, they will remain with the watch. Anyways, I've edited this thread to share this watch and it's journey 馃榾
*Don't mind the bracelet changing marks on the back of the lugs. I bought this watch to wear and enjoy 馃榾
It wasn't until much later that I realized the papers included with my watch weren't for my watch but for another 16220 (possible IBM as well) Datejust. With the help of another member, we looked into every IBM Datejust we could find, and found a plausible reason why my papers were incorrect. Every IBM Datejust that we could find, that was pictured with their papers, had the name Michael C Fina stamped on them, which was a jeweler in NY. It's possible the jeweler put the papers in the incorrect box from the get go, but we had a feeling this was accidentally done by IBM when they received and inspected the watch(es). Its all speculation but both of us were confident these papers have lived their entire life with my watch. Like the two brochures, the papers had crisp folded edges that looked to have never been opened. It's a bummer the papers didn't match but to me, these are part of the watch and I really don't mind it.
Initially, I created this thread hoping to reunite these papers with the correct watch, but I went into that experiment knowing it was rather fanciful and unlikely to be successful. Too many variable stacked up against me. I couldn't bring myself to just bin the papers and I curious enough to give it a try. But I guess, if you know someone that has an IBM Quarter Century watch from the 90's that's missing the papers, maybe I have them 馃槈 Until then, they will remain with the watch. Anyways, I've edited this thread to share this watch and it's journey 馃榾
Edited:


