My greying Milgauss

Posts
87
Likes
409
@Dan S its not a faraday cage.

I’m only saying that as I was spanked down on that issue lol.
Just needs a catchy name.

Tesla Coil
Faraday Cage
Flux Capacitor

Lets just agree to call it a Gauss Deflector. I think we can make it stick
 
Posts
21,601
Likes
48,947
@Dan S its not a faraday cage.

I’m only saying that as I was spanked down on that issue lol.

I haven't read the thread well enough to know why people are criticizing you, but as a physicist, I feel comfortable saying that in the case of the IWC, the design does essentially serve as a Faraday cage/magnetic-shield. As I understand it, there is a continuous surrounding conductive enclosure around the movement (the soft iron back cover connects to the back of the dial) and that is how a Faraday cage is used to shield things from external fields. It isn't the way we would make a Faraday cage in the lab, but it still serves that purpose. If people are telling you that a Faraday cage must be made of mu-metal mesh, I think they are defining the concept too narrowly.
Edited:
 
Posts
17,740
Likes
26,926
I haven't read the thread well enough to know why people are criticizing you, but as a physicist, I feel comfortable saying that in the case of the IWC, the design does essentially serve as a Faraday cage/magnetic-shield. As I understand it, there is a continuous surrounding conductive enclosure around the movement (the soft iron back cover connects to the back of the dial) and that is how a Faraday cage is used to shield things from external fields. It isn't the way we would make a Faraday cage in the lab, but it still serves that purpose. If people are telling you that a Faraday cage must be made of mu-metal mesh, I think they are defining the concept too narrowly.

no it’s just that faraday cages do not stop magnetic forces.
 
Posts
21,601
Likes
48,947
no it’s just that faraday cages do not stop magnetic forces.

OK, I understand what you are saying. Magnetic shield is a better term since the primary purpose is shielding from DC fields.
Edited:
 
Posts
87
Likes
409
no it’s just that faraday cages do not stop magnetic forces.

a Faraday cage just needs to be conductive.

the Gauss Deflector, needs a high magnetic permeability, low remanence (mu metal good) and high saturation (mu metal, meh)
 
Posts
5,393
Likes
9,209
The old Ingenieur's, MK 11's from IWC and JLC, Omega's mil. 1953 and all Railmasters, the original vintage Rolex Milgauss and the Patek Amagnetic , the JLC Geophysique and others all had Mu Metal properties. I owned all of them and could check out the set up.
 
Posts
87
Likes
409
  1. So, small mystery solved. The Jack Forster's comparison, he mentioned that neither the Milgauss nor the Omega >15,000 Gauss attracted much to his strong magnet. This makes sense for the Omega, but not for the Milgauss.

  2. This video does show the magnet attracted to the Milgauss
 
Posts
17,740
Likes
26,926
  1. So, small mystery solved. The Jack Forster's comparison, he mentioned that neither the Milgauss nor the Omega >15,000 Gauss attracted much to his strong magnet. This makes sense for the Omega, but not for the Milgauss.

  2. This video does show the magnet attracted to the Milgauss
I’m not sure how that necessarily affects or demonstrates the watches tolerance for gauss fields.

what mystery is it solving?
 
Posts
221
Likes
427
Haven’t noted any greying of my GV dial over the years. Always thought it was a bit more grey than black at day 1 vs the non-GV model. So I never tried to note if it’s changing, and it’s not like I see many GV in the wild to compare.
 
Posts
6,525
Likes
26,480
I just watched a video that made me think of @OptionZ and this discussion of what the dial is made of. While they haven’t been around for a little while, I figured others would be interested to see. Unfortunately this video is in the form of a “story” on Instagram and I am unable to share it here, so here are a few screenshots.

Starting with, once the caseback has been removed:


I still believe the dial to be brass. According to the video, the dial is affixed to an iron casing.


Here is the dial side of the movement casing.


Here is the side of the movement case that is seen in image one


And the movement once the back of the movement casing is unscrewed.