Forums Latest Members

My first vintage Omega 14ct constellation (168005, 564)

  1. Beau Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    8
    Likes
    7
    Hello everyone :)
    I recently took a trip to Arizona and purchased my first vintage Omega for less than a thousand from an old jewelry shop. The watch is a constellation with a 564 movement and a reference number of 168005. The watch is 14ct gold and is currently keeping good time. The owner of the jewelry shop was selling the watch on consignment for an elder friend who was said to be the original owner. He stated that watch face hadn't been refinished, and that the watch had a rare factory original back cover that was intended for engraving (no observatory). I really liked the watch so I decided to take a chance on it. I recently ordered a new Omega brand crystal for the watch and will likely send it to TLC watch repair in Texas for service. The current crystal is not original and is really scratched up so the pics are a bit distorted.
    I'm a beginner so I wanted to run it past you guys.
    Is the face redialed?( looks original but the seconds marker near the 12 looks a bit off imo)
    Is the back original?
    Thanks, :)
     
    IMG952018041095212827034_01.jpg IMG952018041095212818194.jpg IMG952018041095212858511.jpg IMG95201804159511130619195BURST001.jpg IMG95201804159511124139295BURST001.jpg IMG95201804159511123292795BURST001.jpg IMG952018041595111206790.jpg IMG_20180415_110658415.jpg IMG_20180412_080405336_HDR.jpg IMG_20180417_010800.jpg
    Edited Apr 17, 2018
    Dedalus05, noelekal, Toishome and 2 others like this.
  2. ulackfocus Apr 16, 2018

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,968
    The information about the caseback is correct - the watch was designed for inscription. These were called "presentation" models, with plain casebacks instead of the usual medallions, meant to be given as awards or gifts.
     
    Edited Apr 17, 2018
    noelekal, felsby and Beau like this.
  3. Sgt_Bilko Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    520
    Likes
    2,501
    That is rather interesting to read confirmation about the plain caseback available for inscriptions. My father has a 14ct Seamaster from 1961 with a similar plain caseback, however there is no inscription on his. On the inside it has a stamp from the "OMEGA WATCH Co".

    $T2eC16J,!)8E9s4l5+pUBSBMDftZ-Q~~60_58.JPG
     
    noelekal and Beau like this.
  4. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    12,168
    Likes
    15,625
    Here is an old ad from Omega regarding the “presentation” casebacks:

    A4AB6867-0030-4687-9292-C47E9C73054A.jpeg

    My example of this watch is very much the same as yours, especially the part about finding it in a jewelry store for stupid cheap money.

    6C0A963D-56BE-45EA-A74B-CDF82D1F2193.jpeg

    Very nice find and your watch should clean up just as nicely.
    gatorcpa
     
    sphinx77, noelekal, Beau and 2 others like this.
  5. Beau Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    8
    Likes
    7
    Thanks for the awesome info :)
    Does it look like a re dial?
     
  6. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    12,168
    Likes
    15,625
    Not at all.
    gatorcpa
     
    sphinx77 and Beau like this.
  7. ulackfocus Apr 17, 2018

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,968
    If it was a redial the only reply you would have gotten from me in the first post was "Redial. Pass."
     
  8. 1jansen Apr 19, 2018

    Posts
    324
    Likes
    633
    Here is an extract from a 1968 Omega catalogue, showing examples of presentation case backs of Constellation.

    20170324_225631.jpg