My first new (Vintage) Omega

Posts
120
Likes
151
Hi All-

I have been reading and learning from this forum for a few months now. My first vintage Omega arrived today 😀 . Until now, I have collected a few Rolex ( a no-date Submariner from the 1970's and a Datejust from the 80's) and my Dad's Tudor from the 1940's. Really like the way this Omega looks, and in the short time I've had it it appears to be running well and keeping time. I really dont know the service history so assuming no service in at least a long while. I believe its from the 1960's, but having trouble narrowing that down. I expected to find a clear serial number inside the case back-- I'm not sure if that number that begins "2846" is a serial number or not? The movement is a 501, based on the number on the movement ( in the photos) does that help with the dating? Was $400 too much to pay? I seemed fair to me, but maybe not-- I really wanted it... Thanks for all you all have helped me learn so far while lurking on this forum, and thanks in advance with any help you can provide on my new (old) Omega!

Edited:
 
Posts
38
Likes
81
Was $400 too much to pay? I seemed fair to me, but maybe not-- I really wanted it...

You've answered the question yourself. Enjoy your purchase!
 
Posts
4,440
Likes
11,289
2846 is the model number and the 14 Million number on the movement is the serial. If the dial has not been repainted and is original, it is a good deal! Even if it has been, I think it's a fair deal. It looks good to me from the blurry pictures but clearer ones would help confirm.
 
Posts
120
Likes
151
2846 is the model number and the 14 Million number on the movement is the serial. If the dial has not been repainted and is original, it is a good deal! Even if it has been, I think it's a fair deal. It looks good to me from the blurry pictures but clearer ones would help confirm.
Ok, so 14 million serial would date the watch to early/mid 1950's? Older than the seller told me, he was not able to show me a photo of the inside so I was taking a bit of a chance but I was fairly convinced there was nothing shady going on. Sorry about the bad photos I'm attaching one more that I hope is a little better. I unfortunately don't have a camera just my phone to use as a camera. Thanks very much.
 
Posts
455
Likes
772
The cal. 501 debuted in 1956 if memory serves me right, so that'll be the earliest year.
 
Posts
120
Likes
151
Well, the charts online date a watch with a 14 million serial number to 1955 or 1956, but I guess those dates are approximate? In any event, I guess it would be a very early caliber 501. Thanks so much for your help. If anybody else has any info or opinions I would love to hear them
 
Posts
120
Likes
151
As I'm reading and trying to learn, and understanding that the Swiss designation does not appear on the dial and probably should, does that make this a likely redial? If so, realizing that a redial is a major detractor to a collector, what do you all think about the quality of the dial?
 
Posts
120
Likes
151
Any opinions from those that know more than I do ( which is the vast majority of you) about the originality of the dial?
 
Posts
3,170
Likes
7,318
Last summer I had almost the same watch pegged in an auction and, seeing as it was a general sale, I was thinking I'd happily go to £500 (six with commission). When the lot came around, I reached for my number on the seat next to me and before I even picked it up the bidding had reached £800. So, yeah, you got a deal. Enjoy it in good health.
 
Posts
465
Likes
786
Like it! Think the price is fair too. Like the gold and black combo. Enjoy!
 
Posts
120
Likes
151
Thanks everyone for your kind words. I ordered a cognac color ostrich strap with a rose gold buckle that arrived today. I'm very happy with the way it looks. Love my Omega!
 
Posts
160
Likes
210
Thanks everyone for your kind words. I ordered a cognac color ostrich strap with a rose gold buckle that arrived today. I'm very happy with the way it looks. Love my Omega!
That's a beautiful combo.