I wonder why some watches end up in certain brands museums and other do not. Thanks for posting.
I think it’s likely just a matter of before auction, Alain or whoever is bidding for Omega has to get a number approved by the company as a ceiling bid and this one exceeded expectation by a fair bit.
Makes sense, but I wonder how they even choose which watches they even want in the museum. I would think every brand would keep one of every model ever made.
It’s not the price but the gold and maroon watch that I find tacky.
Some people don't like rose or yellow gold for some reason, all personal choice. I find the maroon bezel a sharp choice for this model and the Moonshine re-edition of 2019. But even if you don't like the gold or bezel I wouldn't call them tacky.
Makes sense, but I wonder how they even choose which watches they even want in the museum. I would think every brand would keep one of every model ever made.
I don't think Omega would be interested in a watch like this, they already have Nos 1 & 2 (Nixon and Agnew) in unworn condition, what would be gained by adding Collins' watch? It wasn't flown, it was a presentation watch that Collins never wore. Manufacturers buy watches back for their museums for sure, but they always have an eye for its commercial value, too. They want watches that add dimension to their brands history and that will reflect positively in future marketing, and eventual sales. I don't think Collins' adds much in that regard.
You are saying that watches that end up in a watch brands museum will eventually be resold again?
$765k! And it probably needs a service as well.
