Forums Latest Members
  1. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    I am inquiring about the originality of the dial on a Marine Nationale Longines.

    1. I was under the impression that “Fab. Suisse” should be printed under “Longines”.
    2. Should the outer track not numerically denote five minute increments?
    3. The “Longines” font does not look correct to me.
    4. The luminous 7 is hooked and the cutout in the luminous 4 is a quadrilateral. Based on the examples below, these two traits are exclusive.

    Other aspects of the watch that are of note are the overly polished case and atypical seconds hand (flat rather than pointed counterbalance).

    Succeeding the images of the watch in question is a number of examples that I believe to be original.

    dialebay3.JPG caseback.JPG case ref.JPG movement.JPG dialrepeat.JPG dial6.JPG dial14.JPG dial9.JPG dial8.JPG dial12.JPG dial16.JPG dial13.JPG dial2.JPG dial51.JPG dial15.JPG
     
  2. Drawarms Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    The seller thats selling this has sold redials before. I don't think they are that experienced in evaluating their own inventory. However, they do have some great deals on watches if you know what your looking for.

    That could be an old redial with period correct replacement hands. Moreover, I'm 100% sure that second hand is not original.
     
  3. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    I appreciate the input.
     
  4. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Feb 8, 2016

    Posts
    2,890
    Likes
    5,960
    The signed font is different than on the other dials. Look very hard, for example at the "G" in "Longines". Pay attention to all the nuances in the letter and you will see they differ.
     
    DirtyDozen12 likes this.
  5. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 9, 2016

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    Believe me, I see the differences. I am only consulting others as I have been "assured" that the dial is original.

    The signature more closely resembles the one from my 1929 caliber 9.47N than one from 1947.

    1929 dial.JPG
     
    Edited Feb 9, 2016
    Modest_Proposal likes this.
  6. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Feb 9, 2016

    Posts
    2,890
    Likes
    5,960
    IMO Pretty different from that as well.
     
  7. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 9, 2016

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    Agreed. I believe that it is significantly different from any original Longines out there, but apparently it is "confirmed" to be original.
     
  8. obstando Feb 9, 2016

    Posts
    354
    Likes
    1,294
    Every example you have posted has a very different minute track from the one you are being told is original - maybe ask yourself why!
     
    nickw likes this.
  9. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 9, 2016

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    I have been convinced that it is a redial from the beginning. I am only looking for validation from other collectors. :thumbsup:
     
  10. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Feb 9, 2016

    Posts
    7,422
    Likes
    20,891
    Agreed on all counts, I would just add the hour and minute hand also look wrong as they should be thicker baton hands.
    The pointy hands in one of the other examples seem wrong.
    The photos with black and white pictures as backgrounds come from French forums and are classic examples.
     
    Darlinboy likes this.
  11. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 9, 2016

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    I feel the same way about the hands, they are very atypical (ugly) for Longines.

    I have found various French forums quite useful whilst learning about these MN pieces. The world of French military issued watches is certainly fascinating.
     
  12. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Feb 9, 2016

    Posts
    7,422
    Likes
    20,891
    The most beautiful ones IMHO are the Tudor snowflakes Marine Nationale of course... Especially when the lume has turned a soft orange, in constrast with the blue bezel and dial.
     
  13. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 9, 2016

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    Edited Feb 9, 2016
  14. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Feb 10, 2016

    Posts
    7,422
    Likes
    20,891
    Edited by a mod Feb 10, 2016
    DirtyDozen12 likes this.
  15. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! Feb 10, 2016

    Posts
    8,736
    Likes
    69,168
    epmat likes this.
  16. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 10, 2016

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    The more elusive, the more rewarding.
     
  17. Syrte MWR Tech Support Dept Feb 10, 2016

    Posts
    7,422
    Likes
    20,891
    You certainly don't seem to be lacking Type 20s :)
     
    Darlinboy and DirtyDozen12 like this.
  18. Darlinboy Pratts! Will I B******S!!! Feb 10, 2016

    Posts
    8,736
    Likes
    69,168
    I am grateful for the ones I have, but always room for more. ;)
     
  19. Drawarms Feb 10, 2016

    Posts
    1,877
    Likes
    1,516
    how is it confirmed to be original?

    The seller of this watch has 0 collecting experience. I would take anything they say with a grain of salt.
     
  20. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! Feb 10, 2016

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    My thoughts exactly.

    It is unfortunate that the seller is so obstinate as some seem to value his opinions.