Forums Latest Members
  1. Dablitzer Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    Respectable members:

    Votes on this 30T2rg Chronometres originality?

    chronometre.jpg


    Sale ended up at £900 excluding buyers premium.
     
  2. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,835
    Saw that one - it has features consistent with an original dial and others that are not. Price not bad though even if it is a redial if the movement is clean.

    For me I will say redial.

    This is for the manual wind experts - paging Bill Sohne, mac_omega and others.
     
    Dablitzer and citizenrich like this.
  3. John R Smith Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    1,320
    Likes
    726
    Be nice to see a movement picture . . .
     
    citizenrich likes this.
  4. Dablitzer Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    0
    Likes
    0
    Unfortunately, the nature of this auction is upon enquiry only... So I never bothered to ask for more pictures. I had a hunch it wasn't original, partly because of the lack of acute accent over the e of Chronometre. But I don't think that's a fool proof method for originality...Nice watch though!
     
  5. mac_omega Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    3,176
    Likes
    6,727
    I have never seen this type of dial before and I have seen many of them... but it is not impossible that this is a legit dial - I can not tell by this picture only - would need much larger pics from different angles...
    Hands (h+m) are not original to this watch for sure.
     
  6. MSNWatch Vintage Omega Aficionado Staff Member Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    6,533
    Likes
    10,835
    This needs a high resolution photo of the dial outside the case to formulate an opinion.
     
  7. Fritz genuflects before the mighty quartzophobe Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    3,817
    Likes
    15,990
    the angles on some of the roman numerals don't look right, the "v" in seven and the ten.....

    redial.
     
  8. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,717
    I think it's an older redial.

    Here are a couple that I believe have original dials:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The OP's dial is a bit odd in that luminous dials generally come with luminous hands.
    gatorcpa
     
  9. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    7,386
    Likes
    24,217
    I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the fact that the (gold) hands don't match the case or dial. That leads me to believe that the dial is refinished.
     
  10. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,717
    I actually thought the case was gold, but the color in the photo was off a bit.

    I'm sure I'm not the only one.
    gatorcpa
     
  11. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Apr 25, 2014

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    The shape of the minute hand is wrong, it should be like this

    [​IMG]
     
  12. mac_omega Apr 26, 2014

    Posts
    3,176
    Likes
    6,727
    I think it is not a luminous dial but a kind of "mirrored" numbers...
     
  13. mac_omega Apr 26, 2014

    Posts
    3,176
    Likes
    6,727
    I mentioned that the hands were wrong - see my first assessment...:)
     
  14. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Apr 26, 2014

    Posts
    12,619
    Likes
    29,915
    Agree, OPs watch has mirror figures.