jolly_jonah
·I am looking into the following example of a "US Army" engraved Omega 2179 but I have a few concerns that I'd like to get some opinions on. The dial has some heavy patina but I don't mind that too much, in fact I kinda like it. Here are the concerns:
Obviously the seconds hand is incorrect. How difficult would it be to find a correct seconds hand to replace it?
The seller states that the seconds hand is "a bit jittery" and recommends a service. Could this be caused by the seconds hand being incorrect?
The lugs look a little shiny and rounded, possibly over polished?
The inside of the caseback shows 2179 but there is no /2 or /3. In some conversations I had with @gatorcpa, he told me that 2179/2 and 2179/3 were the only sub-references known to have the engraving. Should I be wary of some tomfoolery?
I know the usual wisdom is to not take on a "project" watch but I wanted to see what you guys think. Thank you in advance and I hope this post finds you well.
Full album: https://imgur.com/a/wYhFoei
Obviously the seconds hand is incorrect. How difficult would it be to find a correct seconds hand to replace it?
The seller states that the seconds hand is "a bit jittery" and recommends a service. Could this be caused by the seconds hand being incorrect?
The lugs look a little shiny and rounded, possibly over polished?
The inside of the caseback shows 2179 but there is no /2 or /3. In some conversations I had with @gatorcpa, he told me that 2179/2 and 2179/3 were the only sub-references known to have the engraving. Should I be wary of some tomfoolery?
I know the usual wisdom is to not take on a "project" watch but I wanted to see what you guys think. Thank you in advance and I hope this post finds you well.
Full album: https://imgur.com/a/wYhFoei