Forums Latest Members

Longines Conquest cal. 291 Dial (Font) Question

  1. Mr.Cairo Nov 20, 2016

    Posts
    521
    Likes
    2,549
    Hi guys and gals,

    Have a look at this 60s cal 291 Conquest with internal cyclops:

    [​IMG]

    I was wondering about its originality.

    Arguments pro original dial:
    - Font seems OK
    - T Swiss Made T correctly placed & font OK
    - Dial overall state / patina seems OK

    Arguments contra original dial:
    - Compared to the ulackfocus thread on automatics, the font is actually not quite OK (the thicker swirl of the C in Conquest, etc). But could this be a variation on a theme? "automatic" looks good though.

    [​IMG] (pic blown up so looks a little wonky)

    [​IMG]

    - No stars (again, could be a 60s variant)?

    Unfortunately I don't have better photos as the watch is not in my possession.

    The movement is claimed to be a 291:
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
     
    Edited Nov 20, 2016
    DaveK likes this.
  2. Mr.Cairo Nov 20, 2016

    Posts
    521
    Likes
    2,549
    I'm going to attempt and answer my own question and say re-dial: the dial lume could have been added later (too white for its age?). Note also that one of the lume dots seems partially to cover the last S of SWISS.

    other ideas?
     
  3. Mr.Cairo Nov 22, 2016

    Posts
    521
    Likes
    2,549
    Anyone have other ideas? Definite redial?
     
  4. ulackfocus Nov 22, 2016

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    The pictures might be making the ink look thicker, and it's fairly easy for a watchmaker to redo the lume without refinishing the dial. If that watch is a redial it's fantastic. I say original because these 60's dials held up well if the watch wasn't abused.
     
  5. Mr.Cairo Nov 22, 2016

    Posts
    521
    Likes
    2,549
  6. ulackfocus Nov 22, 2016

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    I aim to please. ;)










    ...... some days. :D
     
    Mr.Cairo and ahartfie like this.
  7. Greatpa Nov 23, 2016

    Posts
    481
    Likes
    943
    Is it me or is the date wheel's number a bit too sloppy. Not trying to be a perfectionist, but the thickness of the digits definitely vary and the digit 1 does not seem strait to me.
     
  8. ahsposo Most fun screen name at ΩF Nov 23, 2016

    Posts
    3,745
    Likes
    19,992
    I think that's the lens - the cyclops - at work...
     
  9. Mr.Cairo Nov 23, 2016

    Posts
    521
    Likes
    2,549
    yep, with cyclops always very difficult to take from an angle where there's no distortion :)
     
    Greatpa likes this.
  10. Greatpa Nov 25, 2016

    Posts
    481
    Likes
    943
    yes, of course ::facepalm1::