Forums Latest Members

Longines cal. 12.68Z from 1949

  1. giotommaseo Jan 29, 2018

    Posts
    87
    Likes
    111
    Hi there,
    I am new to the forum and would like to have your honest opinion and thoughts on that Oversize (38mm) Longines.
    Cheers,
    Giovanni

    longines4915_3.jpg longines4915_5.jpg longines4915_6.jpg longines4915_7.jpg
     
    Jerseyhammer likes this.
  2. bubba48 Jan 29, 2018

    Posts
    1,548
    Likes
    7,871
    I'm afraid it is a redial.
     
  3. mario linus Jan 29, 2018

    Posts
    115
    Likes
    59
    Yes, redial
     
  4. giotommaseo Jan 29, 2018

    Posts
    87
    Likes
    111
    Hi Mario, thanks for the answer.
    I thought that in the late 40s the longines dials were enamel painted by hand...
     
  5. Mr.Cairo Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    521
    Likes
    2,549
    +1 redial
     
  6. giotommaseo Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    87
    Likes
    111
    ...but not so badly done, or?
    ...however I had I watchmaker (who is doing Longines customer service) in my town have a look at the dial and he said he's not sure whether the dial has been repainted or not...
     
  7. Mr.Cairo Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    521
    Likes
    2,549
    As far as I can tell and know, biggest giveaway is the dial foot top left on movement pic. It should be brass colored. Also, the painted winged hourglass logo was only done starting with the 60s I think.

    It's not a bad redial in my opinion for wearing purposes. But resale value, not sure
     
    Waltesefalcon likes this.
  8. giotommaseo Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    87
    Likes
    111
    Actually, the dial foot is brass coloured and not, for instance silvery shining. On the picture it can´t be really seen, since the foot is protruding the hole...
    Anyhow, as you said, for wearing purposes it´s ok. I won´t sell the timepiece...
     
  9. Mr.Cairo Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    521
    Likes
    2,549
    Indeed, the chosen dial is not too bad; better than some others I've seen. Nice cream color.

    This how it probably looked originally:

    vintage_longines_oversize_watch_4.jpg ngd8qt.jpg
     
    Waltesefalcon likes this.
  10. giotommaseo Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    87
    Likes
    111
    I see!
    Beautiful pictures
     
  11. giotommaseo Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    87
    Likes
    111
    ... so let’s see if I learned the lesson:
    this dial should be original, not redialed... 79C37A40-0BF8-4E80-9A5D-F074C45B0D83.png E70B369B-AD05-400B-88BE-2DE0EC691AAA.png
     
  12. bubba48 Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    1,548
    Likes
    7,871
    Mario? ::confused2:: Who is Mario?? :confused:
     
  13. Mr.Cairo Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    521
    Likes
    2,549
    Thanks, but they're not my pictures :)

    And yes I would say that second one looks original
     
  14. giotommaseo Jan 30, 2018

    Posts
    87
    Likes
    111
    I repled to the forum member “mario linus”
     
  15. bubba48 Jan 31, 2018

    Posts
    1,548
    Likes
    7,871
    Sorry for the misunderstanding but you had quoted me...:)
     
  16. giotommaseo Jan 31, 2018

    Posts
    87
    Likes
    111
    no problem! :)
     
  17. giotommaseo May 3, 2018

    Posts
    87
    Likes
    111
    Just found on Chrono24 a Longines 7855 from the late 60s (according to the serial number) with the exact same printed logo on the dial as my Longines 4915 from the late 40s (look at the "I" of Longines and at the left wing, for instance).
    Apparently done by the same redialer, or an "official" stamp from Longines used by different redialers?!
    Does anyone have an idea how to solve that enigma?

    cheers,
    Giovanni
    longines_7855_year1968_145664XX.jpg longines4915_3.jpg
     
  18. DirtyDozen12 Thanks, mystery donor! May 3, 2018

    Posts
    2,684
    Likes
    4,610
    Neither dial is consistent with the level of quality that original Longines dials present. It seems likely that both dials were refinished by the same person. Both watches are from Chrono24, a dangerous place to buy vintage Longines.
     
    Tony C. likes this.
  19. Tony C. Ωf Jury member May 3, 2018

    Posts
    7,385
    Likes
    24,214
    There are several obvious problems with the black (re)dial.

    It is useful to compare a correct, original example of that type of printed logo:

    [​IMG]
     
    NT931, adi4, aap and 1 other person like this.
  20. maxgara1979 May 30, 2022

    Posts
    1
    Likes
    2
    Ciao Giovanni,
    sorry for resurrecting this old thread, but I bumped into it by chance today and I immediately noticed the similarities between your dial and one of my watches.

    My grandfather bought this Longines 12.68z in Switzerland, in 1944 and kept using it on a daily basis until the mid '90s when he replaced it with a cheap $10 Casio. After disappearing for almost 20 years, his watch was found again a few years ago in a drawer in very bad conditions but still functioning.
    IMG_3332.JPG
    As expected, all numbers peeled off soon after removing the dial from the case, but enough was left to see one interesting detail of the logo
    dial cropped.jpg

    Note in particular the unique and asymmetrical design of the left wing which is identical to yours. Interestingly, this small detail is not found in any official Longines logotype, but I noticed it in a few watches spotted online over the years.
    dial logo.jpg

    Following the comments received from a Longines expert, I started investigating whereas my dial was original or not. To my surprise, the Longines Museum in Switzerland provided the following information:

    The serial number 6’729’xxx identifies a stainless steel wristwatch with the reference 4858.

    It was invoiced to Messrs.’ Wirth, who were for many years our agent for Switzerland, on 25.08.1944.

    After much researches and our experimented watchmaker analysis, it appears that from 1938 to 1948 watches have only the logotype with “Longines”, without the winged hourglass. This was placed on dials only around 1952’


    A further research suggested that the dial was original and manufactured by Stern Frères of Geneva, but possibly re-dialed or refinished in 1974. In fact, this date is engraved on the back of the dial suggesting that some sort of work was carried out on the watch at that time.
    Capture.JPG
    Most likely, the winged hourglass was added at that time and possibly the overall look of the dial altered. This is very strange though because my grandfather's budget was very tight and I'm really surprised he had money to spent on necessary cosmetic improvements to the watch.

    This is not answering your question, but certainly your thread gave me some food for thoughts.

    By the way, this is my watch now after a beauty spa.

    IMG_0255[1].JPG

    Massimiliano
     
    IMG_3353.JPG
    Omegafanman and GuiltunderGlass like this.