Forums Latest Members
  1. nickw May 12, 2016

    Posts
    331
    Likes
    711
    And now it's been hodinkeed :(
     
  2. donkii May 12, 2016

    Posts
    1,391
    Likes
    14,751
    Will it go beyond 10k inc commission?
     
  3. nickw May 12, 2016

    Posts
    331
    Likes
    711
    Unfortunately for those of us on the hunt I'm guessing yes
     
  4. x3no May 12, 2016

    Posts
    853
    Likes
    2,434
    And also unfortunate for those of us who are [being greedy] looking for more. :p
     
  5. marturx May 14, 2016

    Posts
    2,266
    Likes
    4,214
    +52%

    They really have an huge influence on the vintage watch market.........
     
  6. styggpyggeno1 ΩF Enforcer ....and thread killer May 14, 2016

    Posts
    3,832
    Likes
    43,906
    108 000 SKR = 13 135 USD...

    I guess some of us are feeling quite wealthy today.

    [​IMG]
     
    Northernman and noelekal like this.
  7. calalum May 14, 2016

    Posts
    1,472
    Likes
    7,719
    I believe that number is totally misleading. I think it includes a buyer's premium of 20% and whatever the seller's commission is (i didn't look but let's say 20% as well), so the net to the seller was many thousands of dollars less). Even at the net number it is high, and shows the sometimes irrational exuberance of the auction route and the frothy market (as well as the desirability of the piece in question, on some level). But don't start thinking of retiring just yet by considering the grossed up price to be the market value of your watch (which is a beauty).
     
  8. styggpyggeno1 ΩF Enforcer ....and thread killer May 14, 2016

    Posts
    3,832
    Likes
    43,906
    So - you mean no one payed 13 135 USD for it?
     
  9. crl848 May 14, 2016

    Posts
    151
    Likes
    949
    Well, it is what a buyer just paid (or contracted to pay). IMO not ridiculous given the rarity and what comparable watches are making. Just wish I was as good at the day job :)
     
  10. calalum May 14, 2016

    Posts
    1,472
    Likes
    7,719
    Maybe my post isn't clear. You seem to be suggesting that your watch is worth that figure, when maybe 40% of that number went to Kaplan's in fees. So the notion that based on the auction result the market value of the watch should be deemed $13k+ is off base, IMO.
     
  11. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector May 14, 2016

    Posts
    16,347
    Likes
    44,902
    Guy pays 13k no matter what else is tacked onto it ie; commission, VAT, watch fairy tax he is going to sell it for 13k as that's this watches worth.

    Doesn't mean all are worth that much straight away but as far as my book reads they just went up a bit as one sold for 13k
     
    tapaptpat, marco and Northernman like this.
  12. crl848 May 14, 2016

    Posts
    151
    Likes
    949
    It's true that one auction result doesn't make a new price level. But it's equally true that someone just paid that much, and that all asking prices will rise to or near that level.
     
  13. styggpyggeno1 ΩF Enforcer ....and thread killer May 14, 2016

    Posts
    3,832
    Likes
    43,906
    Sorry, I do not get it (and yes - your post is not clear). If someone is willing to pay 13 135 USD for a watch - that is not the market value? What the sum is built up of and what part is Kaplans is irrelevant. He or she has, or are going to pay, 13 135 dollars for it. That is the market value at that point and for a watch in similar condition.

    What we think of the sum is also irrelevant. It has happened. Am I going to get that the day I sell - who knows. It could be double or 100 bucks.
     
    Northernman likes this.
  14. calalum May 14, 2016

    Posts
    1,472
    Likes
    7,719
    No, I would say that is the gross price paid at the auction. When the big Speedmaster auction results came in, did they reset market prices at those high levels? I think that the posts on the sales board here and elsewhere tell us that the answer is an obvious "no".
     
  15. styggpyggeno1 ΩF Enforcer ....and thread killer May 14, 2016

    Posts
    3,832
    Likes
    43,906
    So - If I were to sell my watch you believe that it would sell for 40% less than the auction price of today?
     
  16. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member May 14, 2016

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    I'll give you 100 bucks, today, right now. You can't have that kind of uncertainty for your retirement.
     
    tapaptpat, x3no, Vitezi and 4 others like this.
  17. marturx May 14, 2016

    Posts
    2,266
    Likes
    4,214
    I think it's interesting to see, in the light of today's auction result, what a bargain above purchase today looks like. Give it another couple of years, and 13k$ may be regarded also as a bargain.

    Or not :)
     
  18. calalum May 14, 2016

    Posts
    1,472
    Likes
    7,719
    That is the wrong question if you are talking about market value. The question you should be asking is if you posted the watch FS would it fetch buyers at $13k+? I would wager that the answer is no.
     
  19. LarryG not KennyG, not OG, just LarryG May 14, 2016

    Posts
    992
    Likes
    3,836
    It perhaps is now cheap given where the Cairelli just sold for at Phillips!
     
  20. styggpyggeno1 ΩF Enforcer ....and thread killer May 14, 2016

    Posts
    3,832
    Likes
    43,906
    Market value is always hypothetical until you put your own watch up for sale. Me selling mine is hypothetical in itself... There are at least two collectors out there that belive that 13k is OK as the second bidder stopped at 12 950.

    I bought my Seamaster 1000m at almost Omegamania high. I guess I am kind of one of the type described above. You win on some and you loose on some - and as long as you really like the watch it does not matter in the long run. In some years I might financially regret not selling at "Kaplans Viggen high" when trying to peddle my watch here for 100 dollars (to LouS). But I will enjoy it until then and have no regrets - as the watch is such a joy to use.