peripatus
·Hi all, I own an Aerosonic-LeCoultre 8 day aircraft clock ...
that's been working happily for 5 years up until now, after I've just had it serviced. Two problems have appeared:
1. The glass face, which is curved, was installed with the wrong side out. They're supposed to present a concave face but it now shows the convex [inner] surface on the outside. This did not fill me with confidence about the thought or experience that had gone into the work on the clock. It might be counter-intuitive to have a concave face but even to me there are some hints in the design that should show which way to put the thing in, even without experience or a manual.
2. Before I sent the clock off for a service, the sweep second hand would faithfully return to zero when re-set. now, it returns to a different point each time it's re-set, specifically 1/2 minute [60 minute scale on dial] further advanced each re-set. So, after 8 re-sets it's on the 4 minute mark.
On 1. the watchmaker reluctantly accepted that the glass was in back to front.
On 2, he suggested that the clock had been damaged in transit [yes, it was sent by mail, well packed]. I guess this is a possibility but I'm a little surprised that each re-set is 1/2 minute [clock scale] further around the dial than the one before, regardless of whether the clock is upright, on its back, tilted so as to allow gravity to favour the hand to "fall" towards where it should be.
The watchmaker had agreed to rectify the problems but because of 1. I'm not sure if I should trust him on 2.
Might I ask you here, is the sweep hand re-set entirely consistent with a loose hand caused by damage in transit or are there any alternate explanations for the problem?
that's been working happily for 5 years up until now, after I've just had it serviced. Two problems have appeared:
1. The glass face, which is curved, was installed with the wrong side out. They're supposed to present a concave face but it now shows the convex [inner] surface on the outside. This did not fill me with confidence about the thought or experience that had gone into the work on the clock. It might be counter-intuitive to have a concave face but even to me there are some hints in the design that should show which way to put the thing in, even without experience or a manual.
2. Before I sent the clock off for a service, the sweep second hand would faithfully return to zero when re-set. now, it returns to a different point each time it's re-set, specifically 1/2 minute [60 minute scale on dial] further advanced each re-set. So, after 8 re-sets it's on the 4 minute mark.
On 1. the watchmaker reluctantly accepted that the glass was in back to front.
On 2, he suggested that the clock had been damaged in transit [yes, it was sent by mail, well packed]. I guess this is a possibility but I'm a little surprised that each re-set is 1/2 minute [clock scale] further around the dial than the one before, regardless of whether the clock is upright, on its back, tilted so as to allow gravity to favour the hand to "fall" towards where it should be.
The watchmaker had agreed to rectify the problems but because of 1. I'm not sure if I should trust him on 2.
Might I ask you here, is the sweep hand re-set entirely consistent with a loose hand caused by damage in transit or are there any alternate explanations for the problem?
