Forums Latest Members

Just found this unique Tiffany MoonPhase

  1. vandy115 Aug 14, 2016

    Posts
    38
    Likes
    3
    Any thoughts or details about this watch?
     
    Screen Shot 2016-08-14 at 11.24.44 AM.png Screen Shot 2016-08-14 at 11.24.57 AM.png
  2. flame Speedmaster Neil Aug 14, 2016

    Posts
    757
    Likes
    2,271
    Hi

    ::puke::

    Best - Neil
     
  3. ahsposo Most fun screen name at ΩF Aug 14, 2016

    Posts
    3,745
    Likes
    19,992
    My thought is that it shouldn't be posted in the Vintage Omega Forum.
     
  4. Jonatan Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    1,783
    Likes
    4,006
    Wow, two posts in and already looking for an argument.

    Welcome, we love to have people like you on this forum. Anything we can do for you?
     
    Finrod Felagund and Syrte like this.
  5. chows99 Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    563
    Likes
    1,341
    This is a nice vintage watch. I will be proud wearing it if I can have 1.
     
  6. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    26,949
    Likes
    32,636
    The person who made the small penis reply is the original poster under a second new account, he and his rubbish watches are now gone.
     
  7. ConElPueblo Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,977
    Thank you. Thank you, thank you, thank you!
     
    Togri v. 2.0 and dsio like this.
  8. Perrier Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    237
    Likes
    183
    I don't know anything about the watch, but my opinion is it looks like a nice, happy watch.
     
  9. Jonatan Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    1,783
    Likes
    4,006
    Seriously? Just seriously? I'm sorry for the comment but I hope there was a problem with google translate.
     
    efauser likes this.
  10. Perrier Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    237
    Likes
    183
  11. Jonatan Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    1,783
    Likes
    4,006
    I apologize. I'm not looking for your posts; I just came upon them.

    For this one everyone is saying that it's a horrible redial in trying the help the OP (which has been removed/banned), and you come along and say it's a beautiful watch which of course confuses people. You can, of course, state your opinion on the watch but don't be insulted if people respond to your comment.

    In the other post regarding your watch not working. Everyone is telling you that you need to get your watch to a watchmaker, not a Jeweler, and yet you keep asking away or correcting people.
     
  12. Perrier Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    237
    Likes
    183
    Literally zero people have said this.


    Thank you for giving me permission to state my opinion. Perhaps keep your pointless remarks to yourself in future.
     
  13. Jonatan Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    1,783
    Likes
    4,006
    Ok you win, nevermind! Waste of time.

    Cheers
     
  14. Tony C. Ωf Jury member Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    7,385
    Likes
    24,202
    It is an extremely poor, and transparent redial.
     
    tyrantlizardrex likes this.
  15. tyrantlizardrex Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    8,881
    Likes
    27,410
    Sadly, appearances can be deceiving.

    This thing is a pile of warm dog eggs.

    Sad times.
     
  16. LouS Mrs Nataf's Other Son Staff Member Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    6,713
    Likes
    18,260
    it is an atrocious redial
     
  17. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Poorly refinished dial. I think it is very sad :(
     
  18. Fost Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    2,052
    Likes
    5,839
    Sorry to say that but I will certainly not ask @Jonatan to keep his 'bitchy, pointless remarks' to himself..... It is certainly one of the most interesting and helpfull member (among others of course) of this forum and his remarks are always full of sense.
    Now, taste and color as we say...if you like 'bouse'* like this one, it is if course your choice and we accept it even if it could Confuse the OP...


    *bouse: French word. This is the very big shit that is coming from the cow ass hole.
     
  19. Modest_Proposal Trying too hard to be one of the cool kids Aug 17, 2016

    Posts
    2,890
    Likes
    5,960
    To be fair to Perrier, nobody had stated directly that it was a redial before he posted (I guess he didn't pick up on the other cues).

    And not everybody in this forum considers themselves a teacher or an appraiser. He claimed very clearly that he was ignorant about its originality and then gave his opinion on how nice he thought it looked. It seems innocent to me. I don't see how anybody could mistakenly take his opinion as an authority. And believe it or not, somebody can say a watch looks nice, even if it's a redial. They have that right.

    THAT BEING SAID, Perrier didn't handle himself well either during the confrontation. So nobody is a winner.