Forums Latest Members
  1. NT931 Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    2,820
    Likes
    14,424
    Hi folks,

    There's a Connie with a 'hidden crown' on sale on ebayPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network. The hidden crown looks pretty cool. But I was just wondering:

    1. The seller says that it is a large 38mm (excl crown), which is odd as googling other 168.004's say they're 35-36mm in size. Is there a 38mm 168.004 in existence?
    2. Are the hands correct? (the minute hand looks rather long?)
    3. Does the dial look refinished?

    Thanks!
     
  2. Robert-Jan #SpeedyTuesday Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    1,496
    Likes
    5,334
    Hi,

    I have a similar model (the 168.004 on the right, left model is a 168.010) and it is 35mm, not 38mm.

    [​IMG]

    I don't seen any particular strange things with regards to the hands and dial, but I am not the Constellation connoisseur. Please check with Desmond from the Constellation blog, he is probably able to help you out there.
     
  3. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    At 35mm, the 168.004 and 168.0010 are larger than the 168.005 dog legs (34mm). An additional difference exists between the .004 and .0010 in that the 0010 has 19mm between the lugs spacing, VS. 18 on the .004, thus giving the watch a larger appearance on the wrist.
     
    Samir likes this.
  4. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    12,586
    Likes
    29,836
    Not sure about the dial, I believe it may have been refinished or at the very least the lume on the figures has been replaced, it should match the aged lume on the hands, which are the correct length for this dome dial.

    Here is a comparison shot of the 168.005 at 34.1-mm and the 168.004 at 35.5-mm.

    IMG_3611.JPG
     
  5. Alpenschneerot Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    1,110
    Likes
    7,818
    Here is mine,
    Ref. 168.004/14,De Luxe version,18 Karat yellow gold, solid gold dial:) IMG_0989[1].JPG
     
    Omyga99, Samir and Privateday7 like this.
  6. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    I think the seller is probably putting a tape measure over the slighly domed crystal to take this measurement. It would probably add 2mm to the total. I think that the case of the Ref. 168.004 is roughly the same diameter as the 168.005 including the crown. So 36mm should be more-or-less correct.

    Taking a measurement of the Ref. 168.004 "including the crown" is somewhat redundant, since a proper measurement would mean removing the crystal and going from bezel edge to bezel edge from 9 o'clock to 3 o'clock. For this watch, the crown would be included by definition since it should not protrude from the bezel at all.

    That's enough of that,
    gatorcpa

    ::deadhorse::
     
  7. webvan Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    606
    Likes
    320
    36mm is going to be pretty wearable in any...case ;-)
     
  8. NT931 Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    2,820
    Likes
    14,424
    Thanks everyone for their opinions! Um, case ... closed? ;-)
     
  9. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795

    How about this 37mm

    [​IMG]
     
    SpaceCowboy, Samir, mercer and 2 others like this.
  10. Privateday7 quotes Miss Universe Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    5,753
    Likes
    2,903
    It's the special Asian version produced in mid 70's, isn't it?
     
    Magnix likes this.
  11. sohail Jun 19, 2013

    Posts
    445
    Likes
    155
    Hi what is the ref no. For this 37mm one.
     
  12. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Jun 20, 2013

    Posts
    15,476
    Likes
    32,328
    "CASE:Almost as perfect. Not a scratch or nick to be found on the upper case, and even the lower case, with the exception of a few perfunctory marks from a case knife,"

    ::confused2::

    Who uses a case knife on a screwback?

    And here's a 168.004

    IMG_0033.JPG
     
  13. Privateday7 quotes Miss Universe Jun 20, 2013

    Posts
    5,753
    Likes
    2,903
    NT931 likes this.
  14. hoipolloi Vintage Omega Connoisseur Jun 20, 2013

    Posts
    3,516
    Likes
    5,795
    Yes, It's a 168.001

    [​IMG]


    and some 168004's

    [​IMG]
     
    NT931 likes this.
  15. NT931 Jun 21, 2013

    Posts
    2,820
    Likes
    14,424
    Oh the auction ended early on the watch I originally posted about. Did anyone here buy it?
     
  16. Privateday7 quotes Miss Universe Jun 21, 2013

    Posts
    5,753
    Likes
    2,903
    Not me..........for sometimes........
     
  17. ulackfocus Jun 21, 2013

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,972
    Wasn't me. Unless a pink gold hooded lug caliber 504 comes up in mint condition I won't be doing much Constellation buying on eBay.
     
  18. Mothra Jun 21, 2013

    Posts
    1,634
    Likes
    1,111
    I'd never bid on something someone else had had brought up and was thinking about buying without them stepping down first... But i guess this site attracts a lot of traffic now....
     
    Bogatir likes this.
  19. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Jun 21, 2013

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    I'm with you on that, but outing a watch on a public forum does indeed draw other people's attention to that watch. I have sent a message to some of the Mods on a couple of pieces where I was serious and sought the opinion of people who know more that I do - one of which I bought and one that went beyond the collective valuation ideals.

    If I were on the outside, looking in, I would pay attention to the e-Bay recommended thread and de-risk my internet buying (unless someone is going Ashley on an auction)
     
  20. Mothra Jun 21, 2013

    Posts
    1,634
    Likes
    1,111
    One day I'm going to go Ashley just so i can say i did....