Itty Bitty Wrist Committee

Posts
1,538
Likes
2,946
Greetings all and hope you're in good health.

There's a YouTube watch reviewer by the name of Jenni Elle who says that she's a member of the "Itty Bitty Wrist Committee" because she has very slender wrists. I too am a member of said committee. My wrist is only a smidge bigger than 6in diameter.

Since I started really getting into watches recently and researching all the great models out there, one thing became apparent. Your options are a lot more limited with modern watches these days if you're a man with slim wrists because of the trend for men's watches to be at least 40-42mm case diameter. Many times I've seen a great looking watch in pictures, only to be bitterly disappointed when I find the case is too big or the lugs are too long. This is especially so with tool watches such as divers, chronographs and pilot watches, which I'm more interested in.

My search for a suitable GMT watch is a case in point. The Omega Planet Ocean GMT looks a great GMT watch and would be cheaper and more readily available than a Rolex GMT Master. Unfortunately, at 43.5mm case diameter it's way too big for me. Same with the Omega Aqua Terra Worldtimer. It's a beautiful watch but why does it have to be 43mm? 🙁 I've also seen some great pilots watches from Oris but again, why do they need to be 44-45mm?

I must admit, I do get a bit frustrated sometimes. Anyone else feel the same? How have you overcome these challenges? Any recommendations for guys with smaller wrists?

Thanks in advance for your responses.
 
Posts
272
Likes
849
It's simple - I just don't buy anything bigger than 40mm. You can find nice watches in 38-40mm range.
 
Posts
7,728
Likes
62,383
It's simple - I just don't buy anything bigger than 40mm. You can find nice watches in 38-40mm range.
I don’t even go that high. 34 - 36mm is my range.
 
Posts
1,538
Likes
2,946
It's simple - I just don't buy anything bigger than 40mm. You can find nice watches in 38-40mm range.
True. Omega Aqua Terra 38mm are beautiful watches. New Rolex Explorer 36mm would fit me perfectly. But the range of contemporary watches in 36-38mm is limited though.
 
Posts
478
Likes
489
6.25in here. Speedmaster is 42mm and it looked good when I tried it. At the opposite, some 40mm are already too big...
How it is measured (speedy includes the crown guard) and the lug-to-lug is at least as important as the diameter.

For example:
- the Deepstar reedition is 40.5mm in diameter, 51mm lug to lug. Too big 🙁
- I have a SPB237, 40.5mm too. 47mm lug to lug and it is perfect 👍

My lug-to-lug limit is at 49. Anything bigger starts to sit out of my wrist...
Just for fun I tried the Seiko Dawn Grey turtle of a friend. Obviously it was too big. Now, it did not look that big considering it is a 45mm watch. It looked more like a "standard" 42. The dial size is important too: the bigger it is (dress watch) the bigger the watch looks

If you do not mind 2nd hand watch and you want a GMT, then I can vouch for the old De Ville coaxial GMT I even put mine on the 2nd strap of the Seiko 😁 (sorry, picture is not great)



It is true that modern watches are usually on the big size. Even if companies are slowly starting to go smaller again, we still have to look each time what's the size before even dreaming about buying it... Thankfully, vintage are there 😀
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,675
I prefer "wiry wrists" myself 😁

Mostly vintage watches here though they range from 27-44mm... The main point is to avoid both large-ish (38m+) with bright dials and slim bezels (for instance some of the newer Longines re-issues) as they look huuuuuge and watches with long lug-to-lug distances as the overhang is unsightly. The perfect storm of these two points is any Nomos that are more than 34mm.
 
Posts
1,538
Likes
2,946
6.25in here. Speedmaster is 42mm and it looked good when I tried it. At the opposite, some 40mm are already too big...
How it is measured (speedy includes the crown guard) and the lug-to-lug is at least as important as the diameter.

For example:
- the Deepstar reedition is 40.5mm in diameter, 51mm lug to lug. Too big 🙁
- I have a SPB237, 40.5mm too. 47mm lug to lug and it is perfect 👍

My lug-to-lug limit is at 49. Anything bigger starts to sit out of my wrist...
Just for fun I tried the Seiko Dawn Grey turtle of a friend. Obviously it was too big. Now, it did not look that big considering it is a 45mm watch. It looked more like a "standard" 42. The dial size is important too: the bigger it is (dress watch) the bigger the watch looks

If you do not mind 2nd hand watch and you want a GMT, then I can vouch for the old De Ville coaxial GMT I even put mine on the 2nd strap of the Seiko 😁 (sorry, picture is not great)



It is true that modern watches are usually on the big size. Even if companies are slowly starting to go smaller again, we still have to look each time what's the size before even dreaming about buying it... Thankfully, vintage are there 😀
Yes. All good points there. My lug to lug limit is 47mm. Unfortunately, this has ruled out the Yema Superman GMT. Whilst case size is only 39mm (yay!), the lug-to-lug is 49mm (boo!).
Agree with you re dial size and design. I think my Speedy FOIS looks fine on me because the sub dials fill in what would otherwise be open expanses of empty dial and distract the viewer from the size. The dark colour and long indices also help the watch wear smaller. If it was a dress watch with a similar dial size then I don't think I can get away with it.
 
Posts
478
Likes
489
Yema Superman GMT. Whilst case size is only 39mm (yay!), the lug-to-lug is 49mm (boo!).
48.3mm to be exact. I have one, want to sell it 😁

TBH I like its look (mine is the limited edition black-grey) but the feel is not great for that price range... Plus, lot of them had the "crazy crown" issue (mine included, it was shipped like this and they needed 2 attempts to decide to change the crown and solve it - QC was not their strength point). I wore it like 10 time in the past year... 🙁
The Seiko is in the same price range but there is a serious quality gap between the 2. Maybe the new version is better, thanks to the in-house mouvement and the experience they got from the initial version with the ETA.

(I am not a great seller 😁)

As a sidenote it would also be fairer to compare it against another small or kickstarter brand instead of Omega, Seiko, Hamilton...
I have a Newmark 71 and for sure it does not look as good as a Khaki Field. Economies of scale...
 
Posts
907
Likes
4,353
I’ve bought a couple of modern field watches in the 36-38mm range and they are a good size. Even with 7.25” wrists, I prefer a smaller case, and most of mine are 34-40mm diameter.

TimeFactors Smiths Everest Expedition - 36mm:


Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical:
 
Posts
2,550
Likes
3,417
Glycine Airman No. 1. Comes in 36mm. It’s a GMT, but probably not the type you are thinking of and you have to like a 24-hour dial.
 
Posts
1,538
Likes
2,946
Glycine Airman No. 1. Comes in 36mm. It’s a GMT, but probably not the type you are thinking of and you have to like a 24-hour dial.
Yes, I did consider it. What appeals to me is that it was the original 2 timezone pilot watch, before the GMT Master appeared. However, the lack of water resistance mitigates against it as a versatile travel watch that I can wear anywhere. Also, for the price I expect sapphire crystal but I realise Glycine wanted to remain true to the original which had plexiglass.
 
Posts
1,144
Likes
3,111
I’d like to pick up several midsize Seamaster pros if I can find them at the right price. Absolutely love the full size 2254 and would love a blue dial and a black dial 36mm.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,538
Likes
2,946
I’d like to pick up several midsize Seamaster pros if I can find them at the right price. Absolutely love the full size 2254 and would love a blue dial and a black dial 36mm.
They are great watches. Love my blue Bond midsize SMP. Fits my small wrist perfectly.
Good luck with your search!
 
Posts
1,538
Likes
2,946
Try vintage? These are all 31mm:
Lovely watches. I like the top two the best.
Thanks for your suggestion. I realise that going vintage would give me more options but I'm after more modern designs.
 
Posts
21,894
Likes
49,688
My search for a suitable GMT watch is a case in point. The Omega Planet Ocean GMT looks a great GMT watch and would be cheaper and more readily available than a Rolex GMT Master. Unfortunately, at 43.5mm case diameter it's way too big for me. Same with the Omega Aqua Terra Worldtimer. It's a beautiful watch but why does it have to be 43mm? 🙁 I've also seen some great pilots watches from Oris but again, why do they need to be 44-45mm?

IMO, none of those designs are particularly appealing so I don't think you're missing out on anything. Maybe you are getting sucked in by too many instagram posts and online promotions. Instead, go in person to some dealers and try on watches in person. Perhaps your tastes will gradually evolve. Forge your own path.
 
Posts
1,538
Likes
2,946
IMO, none of those designs are particularly appealing so I don't think you're missing out on anything. Maybe you are getting sucked in by too many instagram posts and online promotions. Instead, go in person to some dealers and try on watches in person. Perhaps your tastes will gradually evolve. Forge your own path.
Thanks for the suggestion. I'm definitely one for trying out watches in person first before buying because sometimes watches which appear too big on paper might actually fit better in real life.