Is this reasonable to expect from a good quality service?

Posts
969
Likes
1,504
Hi, folks-- a couple of things have happened recently that have made me question my watchmaker's skills and I am wondering if I am being unreasonable or if I should find a new watchmaker.

The issue is the same for two watches, a 105.012 Speedmaster and a Zentih A277: Both received a full overhaul within about the last two years, and I recently noticed--separately-- that the chronos on both are not working correctly. The Speedy's reset button stopped functioning entirely, and the Zenith reset doesn't reset the hour counter (only the minute counter).

I tested the functions when I first got the watches back--indeed, I had to return the Speedy right away the first time because the chrono sweep would get stuck.

I don't wear either of these watches on a daily basis. They get worn in rotation, sometimes not at all for months, then sometimes a few times a month, then again infrequently, and so on, in no particular order except as my mood dictates. I'd estimate that I wear each watch no more than, oh, 10 times per year?

I never use the chrono functions in any case, but for some reason I decided to try it on the Speedy recently and discovered the issue with the reset button. That led me to try out the Zenith chrono and discover that problem, too.

So: Are chronos that are 50+ years old just never going to remain reliably functional, given their age, or should a serviced chrono of this age be expected to reliably perform for 4 or 5 (or some number) of years?
 
Posts
7,641
Likes
26,491
Those movements are good enough that I wouldn't expect problems within that period of time after a good service. However, you made a tactical error by not testing the chrono functions immediately after the service, and the issue is clouded somewhat as a result.
 
Posts
969
Likes
1,504
Thanks, Tony. Perhaps I was not clear: I did test them immediately after getting them back, and they worked at the time. They stopped working sometime between then and now, having only been worn 10 or 20 times over the two year period.

In any case, they are out of warranty because the service is only guaranteed for one year.

I suppose I should have tested them near the end of the first year.
 
Posts
27,344
Likes
69,732
So: Are chronos that are 50+ years old just never going to remain reliably functional, given their age, or should a serviced chrono of this age be expected to reliably perform for 4 or 5 (or some number) of years?

The latter...
 
Posts
2,040
Likes
3,552
Your watchmaker….is he a butcher during the day who fixes watches of an evening? ‘cos if he is then I have absolutely no doubts as to his ability as a butcher
 
Posts
969
Likes
1,504
Well I didn’t think so, but maybe I should ask him for a steak and see how it goes.
 
Posts
2,040
Likes
3,552
Be careful of his sausages though, they might have leftover watch parts and chopped up watch straps in ‘em!
 
Posts
12,910
Likes
51,616
I have a fleet of old chronographs including a Longines from 1919. They all work fine. Most have been serviced, so no what you are describing is not acceptable.
 
Posts
969
Likes
1,504
Thanks everyone. As I feared, I either have had very bad luck or my watchmaker is not up to snuff.
 
Posts
16,205
Likes
44,638
Thanks everyone. As I feared, I either have had very bad luck or my watchmaker is not up to snuff.

I had this issue the last few years with my watchmaker of 20 years (lovely guy and in years past never had an issue with any of my watches including my Speedy). I gave him about 5 watches over the last year or so, 3 of which were chrono’s. I got two of the chronos back- one worked and the other immediately had an issue when I tested it in front of him (seemed to work fine but when I shook the watch while the chrono was engaged, the minutes counter flopped around). Had the same issue again when I went back the second time and the other chrono was running fast.

I have known him well for 20 years, so felt comfortable having the talk with him a few weeks ago to ask what’s going on as I knew he was clearly having some QC issues. Apparently he is having neurological problems with seizures and numbness in his fingers- some days he’s fine, others not. He said 3 handers are easy, but chronographs take more time, dexterity and patience. He gave me back the one that had the floppy hand issue and it’s running fine, he handed back the third chrono he hadn’t done yet and said he will fix the one that’s running fast.
He really doesn’t want to do vintage chronos anymore, and that’s fine, now I know what he is comfortable doing, I know what to expect,
 
Posts
969
Likes
1,504
Yes my guy has been around the block, too, so maybe it’s age. A shame because he is very well priced!
 
Posts
16,205
Likes
44,638
Yes my guy has been around the block, too, so maybe it’s age. A shame because he is very well priced!
I’m not one to throw the baby out with the bathwater, particularly if there is a human involved.
Just because I am a photographer doesn’t mean I specialize in all things photography nor do I want to do all things photography. I spent the decade after college doing weddings- I was good at them! But you couldn’t pay me enough to do one now that I don’t need to pay off the student loans (ok, $10k plus expenses would be enough for me to do one now).

Talk to your watchmaker and let him know about the two watches with the issues- kindly of course, no need to go in confrontationally . He may offer to repair them gratis or may say he’s done with chronographs- either way you have an opportunity to talk to him about it.

if like my watchmaker he would rather stick to simpler repairs, that’s fine- just take him 3-handers and find another watchmaker for chronographs.
I know many members here have multiple watchmakers for different things.