Forums Latest Members
  1. Shamploo Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    3
    Likes
    0
  2. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    26,751
    Likes
    32,468
    Looks like a C-case, Mike and Dennis can give more detail
     
  3. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    4,411
    Likes
    11,220
    Looks authentic, but I think it might be a ladies model?
     
  4. Shamploo Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    3
    Likes
    0
  5. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
  6. Shamploo Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    3
    Likes
    0
    Yeah, it's definitely a women's model,
    does anyone know approximate year or any other details?
     
  7. ulackfocus Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,968
    It's most likely a late 60's model. Decent watch, but lady's models don't command anywhere near the price the men's models do.
     
  8. smithrjd Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    267
    Likes
    49
    Bad thing about ladies watches is no matter how good they are they are worth what the scrap value is for the most part. I can get the women in my life a really nice watch for little money and save the rest for me.. Wish mens watches were priced the same.
     
  9. ulackfocus Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,968
    That looks like a caliber 682 inside a reference 568.001 - the non-date version was a 567.001 with a caliber 672. These were introduced in 1966 and were offered into the early 70's.
     
  10. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    26,751
    Likes
    32,468
    IMO Kyle would fit that ::bleh::
     
  11. ulackfocus Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    25,983
    Likes
    26,968
    Where's the boxing smiley? :p
     
  12. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    4,411
    Likes
    11,220
    [​IMG]
     
  13. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Jun 28, 2012

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    Don't mess with the Grasshopper
    sdsds.jpg :cautious: