Is this dial authentic

Posts
108
Likes
54
Hi all , I have come across this dial and i can't figure out if it is authentic. The main reason being that I have never seen " ANTIMAGNETIC" on any Omega dial before. Could anyone weight in on this? Also, from where the legs are positioned, I have ruled out the 30t series, 260-269 and the 28.10R and the 340-354 series. It almost looks like a 600 but it has a sub dial and a calendar. Any thought on that? Thank you in advance.

 
Posts
17,945
Likes
37,524
You're right to have doubts.
First, Omega never used "Antimagnetic" on their dials, only "Non-Magnetic".
Second giveaway is the fresh radial sunburst finish on the dial, often a sign of a redial.
Third, the printing (text/logo/markers) all indicate a repainted dial.
Lastly, as there's no other Ω indication, it's impossible to say if this was originally an Omega dialat all.
 
Posts
34,272
Likes
38,894
Yea that's no good as Jim mentioned, no value at all in that one
 
Posts
108
Likes
54
You're right to have doubts.
First, Omega never used "Antimagnetic" on their dials, only "Non-Magnetic".
Second giveaway is the fresh radial sunburst finish on the dial, often a sign of a redial.
Third, the printing (text/logo/markers) all indicate a repainted dial.
Lastly, as there's no other Ω indication, it's impossible to say if this was originally an Omega dialat all.
Thanks for the info.