Forums Latest Members
  1. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Apr 7, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Hey guys,

    Is this common for an extract? Nothing specified other than movement number, date of manufacture and country delivered to?

    IMG_20150407_225151_edit.png

    Seems a bit disappointing.

    Is the Remark section saying this was not Omega branded?

    This is from a c24 listing. Curious.

    Thanks for feedback!

    J
     
  2. alam Apr 7, 2015

    Posts
    8,095
    Likes
    18,681
  3. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Apr 8, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    Thanks, exactly what I was hoping to learn!
     
  4. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Apr 8, 2015

    Posts
    26,923
    Likes
    32,597
    A lof of watches like Cal 321s and Cal 320s that you see in South America were produced by Lemania during that "black hole" period where Lemania didn't keep accurate records or pass them to Omega. As it suggests Lemania was a subsidiary of Omega at the time and they produced all of the 320/321 movements its just that most were shipped to Omega to case up after a certain point. Before that point Lemania cased them up themselves and for some markets like South America they handled the whole thing, hence the gap in Omega's records.
     
  5. watchlovr Apr 8, 2015

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
    Yup, got one very similar for my 2998-61.
    I was very disappointed, did some research and found out that a lot or recent 1060 ish cal 321 Speedmasters were assembled by Lemania under licence, therefore, no real records.
    "Only what is written in the records" was the mantra
     
  6. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Apr 8, 2015

    Posts
    26,923
    Likes
    32,597
    Its the only responsible approach for them to take, many years ago they did issue certs for these watches based on information the owner supplied, which is in no way accurate. So if you ever see an older cert with information on early Speedmasters be aware that its not with any verification.
     
  7. oddboy Zero to Grail+2998 In Six Months Apr 8, 2015

    Posts
    9,217
    Likes
    23,880
    thanks for the feedback guys. seems it is fairly common for some types. I was curious as I recently requested an extract and was just notified yesterday that Omega was cancelling the request because they didn't have enough information. When i stumbled upon this listing on c24 with a pretty much empty extract i was wondering why they might cancel my request even if they can provide other empty extracts.

    anyway, no harm, no foul... just curious.

    Edit: incidentally, that extract i posted in the first post was for a 105.012, but the serial is 18m, and the date is listed as 1968. that's a bit odd too.
     
  8. dsio Ash @ ΩF Staff Member Apr 8, 2015

    Posts
    26,923
    Likes
    32,597
    I think these are a bit different again from the Speedmasters, this extract was 62 which is around the time Speedmaster info starts but this watch was still a Lemania produced model, and indeed shipped to Columbia which is fitting with South American production. So I'd say this one there ARE records of but they're just not as detailed as Omega records as Lemania wasn't as fastidious. Whereas the early Speedmasters there's no records of at all.
     
  9. Tom Dick and Harry Apr 8, 2015

    Posts
    1,527
    Likes
    4,343
    This is exactly the same for the majority of calibre 28.9 and 33.3 watches
     
  10. watchlovr Apr 9, 2015

    Posts
    1,751
    Likes
    2,460
  11. richardew Apr 9, 2015

    Posts
    446
    Likes
    530
    I think that 18.945.xxx c321 series is from a ck 2998-5. A lot of them come back that way.
     
  12. BASE1000 Prolific Speedmaster Hoarder Apr 9, 2015

    Posts
    443
    Likes
    816
    In 2011 I got the follwing answer from the Omega Museum in Bienne which might enlighten all the questions about the extract for the early cal 321 Speedys (please use google translator as I am too lazy for tranlasting it ;)):

    "Gewisse Referenzen wurden von Lémania, einer Tochterfirma von OMEGA, fertig gestellt. Jedoch ist das Uhrwerk original OMEGA. Leider sind die Archive der Firma Lémania nicht mehr auffindbar, aus diesem Grund sind die meisten Positionen auf einem Archivauszug einer Uhr, produziert von Lémania, mit „Not mentioned“ geschrieben.

    Aufgrund von alten Dokumenten im OMEGA-Archiv können wir sagen, wohin die Uhr nach ihrer Fertigstellung bei Lémania geliefert wurde.

    Wegen verschiedenen Vorkommnissen, bestätigen wir nur noch, wie die Uhr unsere Firma zu der Zeit verlassen hatte. Ein Extract bestätigt nicht die Echtheit einer Uhr.

    Das Kaliber 321 wurde in mehrere Referenzen verbaut. OMEGA hat die Werke an Lémania geliefert und diese wurden dort verbaut. Aus diesem Grund wissen wir nicht welches Werk zu welcher Referenz gehört."
     
  13. incabloc Apr 9, 2015

    Posts
    551
    Likes
    1,715
    I had the same issue with my 105.002-62. Movement serial is 198328.. , produced 18.09.63, delivered to South Africa. Thats all..... :(