Forums Latest Members
  1. bucksandreds Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    174
    Likes
    140
    I'm looking for my first Omega and trying to maintain a budget and this caught my eye. Could I get an expert judge on the condition? Thanks in advance
     
    watch.png watch 2.png watch 1.png
  2. bucksandreds Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    174
    Likes
    140
    More photos
     
    watch 3.png watch 4.png
  3. mac_omega Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    3,176
    Likes
    6,727
    I would pass...
     
    bucksandreds likes this.
  4. bucksandreds Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    174
    Likes
    140
    I will. Can I learn why on this one?
     
  5. Rochete Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    1,232
    Likes
    5,571
    Crown is obviously not original. Case is overpolished. Can't say anything about dial with that photo. No pic of inner caseback?
     
    bucksandreds and connieseamaster like this.
  6. mac_omega Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    3,176
    Likes
    6,727
    Heavily polished, movement screws missing, corrosion on the screws indicates that there moisture has been involved - so you don´t know how it looks below the dial...

    and I don´t like the crown
     
    bucksandreds likes this.
  7. bucksandreds Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    174
    Likes
    140
    Thank you, Seller claimed original crown and unpolished.
     
  8. bucksandreds Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    174
    Likes
    140
    I thought that the crown was unlikely to be original
     
  9. Rochete Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    1,232
    Likes
    5,571
    Some people claim Earth is flat.
     
    Edward53 and bucksandreds like this.
  10. bucksandreds Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    174
    Likes
    140
    I wont buy. He wanted $700 and if you guys liked then I was going to offer $550. if it had the original crown, not overpolished and no corrosion would $550 have been reasonable?
     
  11. Rochete Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    1,232
    Likes
    5,571
    On the expensive side, plus we still don't know inner caseback ref. number to check if case and and movement match.
     
    bucksandreds likes this.
  12. Rochete Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    1,232
    Likes
    5,571
    Also, the lack of "Seamaster" on dial raises questions. Some early SM weren't marked on dial but this watch doesn't look that old.
     
    Dr No and bucksandreds like this.
  13. bucksandreds Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    174
    Likes
    140
    sorry.
     
    watch 5.png
  14. 104RS Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    211
    Likes
    396
    Overpriced for the (...) Condition.
     
    bucksandreds likes this.
  15. Rochete Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    1,232
    Likes
    5,571
    AFAIK Seamasters of that reference were marked on dial (like the one in your other thread)
     
    bucksandreds likes this.
  16. bucksandreds Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    174
    Likes
    140
    What do you think of the one in the other thread?
     
  17. Dr No Dec 27, 2018

    Posts
    2,207
    Likes
    19,703
    Seamaster back w/o Seamaster on the dial?

    I think ref #135.007 is for a SM 30.

    Art
     
    bucksandreds likes this.