- Posts
- 11
- Likes
- 3
Is this a real omega?
- Posts
- 11
- Likes
- 3
Nephalem
·
- Posts
- 1,433
- Likes
- 1,579
shaun hk
·I would say original dial, but would love to hear other opinions.
- Posts
- 363
- Likes
- 1,274
duffy7
·Dial looks good to me - didn't check whether the cal. 565 matches with a 166.001
- Posts
- 328
- Likes
- 441
Benbradstock
·Dial looks great, case looks crisp.
- Posts
- 278
- Likes
- 1,384
miramogge
·Nice dial. I don’t see any warning signs that it’s a redial.
- Posts
- 13,209
- Likes
- 22,973
Davidt
·Dial looks fine.
The rule around broken crosshairs indicating a redial kinda go out the window in the late 60's, particularly on 166.002's and similar.
The rule around broken crosshairs indicating a redial kinda go out the window in the late 60's, particularly on 166.002's and similar.
- Posts
- 4,593
- Likes
- 10,810
janice&fred
·I agree with all above and that thing is a stunner inside and out!
- Posts
- 11
- Likes
- 3
Nephalem
·How do you guys know it’s a redial
- Posts
- 3,785
- Likes
- 20,205
- Posts
- 11
- Likes
- 3
Nephalem
·The glass has been replaced with plexiglass. Does this affect the value?
- Posts
- 4,342
- Likes
- 10,317
redpcar
·Crystal was plastic from the factory. No worries.
- Posts
- 11
- Likes
- 3
- Posts
- 4,342
- Likes
- 10,317
redpcar
·I would say the crystal is the least of concern as they don't hold up well over time. An Omega crystal adds value. Most are still available as a replacement so don't sweat it.
Similar threads
- Posts
- 5
- Views
- 1K
- Posts
- 3
- Views
- 3K
- Posts
- 12
- Views
- 3K
- Posts
- 6
- Views
- 524
- Posts
- 9
- Views
- 1K
