Forums Latest Members
  1. instigator008 Mar 24, 2014

    Posts
    45
    Likes
    1
    Just wondering if this bracelet looks legit to you guys? It doesn't look like any vintage bracelets I have but I thought I'd check:

    Omega Vintage stainless 1162 bracelet with 22 mm 172 ends

    http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&id=271431367087Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
     
  2. Georgieboy58 Mar 24, 2014

    Posts
    576
    Likes
    856
  3. instigator008 Mar 24, 2014

    Posts
    45
    Likes
    1
    OK. Wasn't sure as I'd only seen the newer style clasps. Thanks
     
  4. tomvox1 Mar 25, 2014

    Posts
    1,204
    Likes
    1,232
    Yes, generally speaking raised clasp logo = vintage and sunken logo = modern era.
    Also the clasp blade nomenclature is a little different.
    Here are those details on the modern version for comparison:
    Omega1162-1.JPG
    Omega1162-2.JPG
    Best,
    T.
     
  5. Commerx Nov 22, 2021

    Posts
    16
    Likes
    4
    Would the more modern 1117 clasp be considered to be 16 Mm
     
  6. Ascalon Jan 13, 2022

    Posts
    187
    Likes
    296
    I think another distinction is the external profile of the 1162 has varied over the years too.
    From this very parish, this is a vintage 1162 as fitted the Mark Series:
    [​IMG]

    Observe the taper in the links from the end link back, there is a more cobra-style shape, flared first, before the reduction to the clasp.
    Contrast that with the one pictured above:
    [​IMG]
    Observe the direct taper back, concave all the way down to the clasp.
    I have a 1972 Mark II, and it came with the upper style 1162, which I really dislike :)
    I have since replaced it with an Uncle Seiko 1171, with Omega 735 end links, and a NOS 1162/173 clasp with the engraved logo. It is, to my eye, a much more elegant aesthetic.

    [​IMG]