njlam
·Currently I only have three Omega watches, 2 Speedmasters (321/3861) and one Seamaster (current ND SMP). As I am still in the acquistive mode of watch collecting, Omega is frustrating as there isn't anything in the current catalog I want.
While the newly introduced Reverse Panda Speedmaster 3861 is attractive, do I really need 3 Speedmasters (or more than one 3861)? Same goes for the Panda 3861 they are likely to introduce soon...
If I am really to stretch to find an Omega I would buy, I do like the Constellation and/or Seamaster 321 from the period of my birth year (1960). These watches are smaller/thinner/more affordable than modern Omegas and are more likely to become part of my collection than another 3861. I think what this tells me is Omega isn't what it used to be. Also, many of its other lines do not have the aspirational identity that carries over generations.
In sharp contrast, I have five Rolex watches (DD/DJ/GMT) and would love to have more if offerred.
I would have no problem owning more than one DD/DJ/GMT and would welcome the opportunity to have a YM/OP or even a Daytona or Sub.
Why is this? I think it is because of Rolexes aesthetic consistency. While Rolex watches improve over time, their aspirational identity remains the same from one generation to the next. A Sub always looks like a Sub, a DJ like a DJ and a DD is always a DD. Many current Omega models look/feel nothing like their same models from 10, 20, 30 years ago.
This is why buyers accept price increases with Rolex where similar increases are met with outrage at Omega.
While the newly introduced Reverse Panda Speedmaster 3861 is attractive, do I really need 3 Speedmasters (or more than one 3861)? Same goes for the Panda 3861 they are likely to introduce soon...
If I am really to stretch to find an Omega I would buy, I do like the Constellation and/or Seamaster 321 from the period of my birth year (1960). These watches are smaller/thinner/more affordable than modern Omegas and are more likely to become part of my collection than another 3861. I think what this tells me is Omega isn't what it used to be. Also, many of its other lines do not have the aspirational identity that carries over generations.
In sharp contrast, I have five Rolex watches (DD/DJ/GMT) and would love to have more if offerred.
I would have no problem owning more than one DD/DJ/GMT and would welcome the opportunity to have a YM/OP or even a Daytona or Sub.
Why is this? I think it is because of Rolexes aesthetic consistency. While Rolex watches improve over time, their aspirational identity remains the same from one generation to the next. A Sub always looks like a Sub, a DJ like a DJ and a DD is always a DD. Many current Omega models look/feel nothing like their same models from 10, 20, 30 years ago.
This is why buyers accept price increases with Rolex where similar increases are met with outrage at Omega.

