- Posts
- 17
- Likes
- 4
Apurba
·Great additional posts with additional cherry picking of what you respond to!
I always find gaslighting so entertaining! So let's lay out how it works.
When asked if you understand that crooked, off-center pictures are misleading, you answered with "I was just giving examples"
The message this sends: I'm not going to answer your question about off-center images because it's not in my interest to do so. Also I've posted a bunch of images of this so it must be common, even if the sources (like r/Reptime) are questionable. Oh, and not to mention they might be in date change. But don't worry about that, these really are examples can't you tell?
"Wanting to know if it is common or not (emoji)"
The message this sends: I've posted several images of this and I've already suggested it's common and now I'm re-asserting it!
"Expecting a watch that costs $5000+ to have nice alignment is too much to ask? (emoji) now, i don't know if i want an omega anymore"
The message this sends: Other than the fact that this completely ignores the poster above who is literally telling you to satisfy your OCD by doing the work yourself, your message is clear: All Omegas are off-alignment- that's my only option so I don't want it anymore.
"i don't expect perfection, i expect nice alignment"
The message this sends: Any Omega I would buy would clearly be out of alignment.
🤨 Ok. Great stuff.
Also, did you honestly go out of your way to post lower case "i's" in this many posts? I can't imagine any modern platform of posting that would let you do that. that's impressive, points awarded for that touch.
"is it something that happens across all the brands(rolex,tudor,breitling,iwc,cartier etc)? Or is it something where OMEGA falls short to other brands in the price range."
The message this sends: Omega falls short vs. the other brands. Heck, you've already suggestively asserted that in your opening post, so this is just more of the same- digging for a specific answer and ignoring any reasonable suggestion or question anyone else asks.
Also, it should be impossible for anyone to disregard the fact that you've clearly shown yourself capable of using google to collect images to supplement your post- so the logical question for anyone reading this should be, why are you even asking this as opposed to just using google to find the dozens of search results of Rolex, GS, and Seiko watches with off-center date windows and other various quality control issues?
"If i start a luxury brand tomorrow, i want my customers to be exactly like you, argumentative,out of touch with reality and easily satisfied. 👍"
The message this sends: You're too stupid to see how badly Omega misaligns ALL their watches based upon this miniscule sample.
Great touch, love it. also with the lower case i's. It's picture-perfect.
Oh- and welcome to the forum btw! You likely won't find it the same environment as r/Reptime (which, I can't tell if you are there a lot or were just really digging for those images!), we're a bit more serious here.
That's a lonnnng post.
I can't be as thorough as you but I will just try to get my point across.
About the pictures I have chosen: they are the latest pictures from the latest models, I tried to post the best angle possible but even if they look weird to you; here are some more "authentic" photos, including the constellation lol from the forum:
None of them are at 10 pm to 2 am. About the 1st photo:The op in the seamaster picture confirmed 10:55 is am not pm in the picture.
They all are clearly off centered.
2nd point: I am not asserting all omegas are off centered but the number of posts I have seen of reddit is a bit too much, not just date wheel but also seconds hand on the speedmaster and the bezel of the smp300. I tried searching for rolexes just as much, but there seems to be not as many posts(there are but not nearly as much). I have seen a lot about tudor, a few about breitling, non about iwc and cartier. Based on that I asked, "if omega falls short of other brands?" Because that's what I have come across.
"If I start a luxury brand tomorrow, I want my customers to be exactly like you, argumentative,out of touch with reality and easily satisfied. 👍"
The message this sends: You're too stupid to see how badly Omega misaligns ALL their watches based upon this miniscule sample.
If one can't see the obvious then one is kinda stupid, 😕 sorry.
I specifically wanted to know if the miniscule example is the norm or not. That's why I specifically asked, "is it normal or a manufacturing defect". But it seems some are to focused on being dismissive.
But hey! Forget about me, what are YOU trying to assert? That I have cherry picked and that omegas in general, have better alignments? I am confused about YOUR stance.
Overall, that's just one example; i have watched so many reviews of so many omegas. A lot those reviews always mention some flaws in most of them. I understand no watch is perfect, but the flaws they mention should never be on a luxury watch in the first place....
Smp300: they say that the bracelet is sharp and sometimes hurts.
Smp300 nttd/60th jb: the mesh bracelet pulls hair, the bezel has backplay.
Sm300 heritage: the bezel has backplay.
Speedmaster 3861: the bracelet pulls hair.
Silver snoppy: has misaligned seconds hand.
All of the flaws they mention, should never be on a luxury watch in the first place.
When you combine all of these flaws with the ones I have mentioned then it does seem like omega makes compromised watches. Again I am not asserting it but the combined overview does seem like it.
That's all.