I think you are completely misunderstanding what my point was, and taking statements of fact as criticisms.
I read people on forums making claims about GS that are so wild it defies belief, with one poster on another forum recently saying that GS makes "the best 3 hand watches on the market" in terms of finishing. That is a claim that is so wild I had a hard time believing it was serious, but that is the level of fanboyism that this brand tends to attract. There's a tendency with GS fans to overcompensate for what they believe is an unfair "lack of respect" for what the brand does, so it's not unusual for people to react badly when I post the photos I posted.
With all that said, I am not saying that GS should be using traditional methods at the prices they sell at, or that Rolex is something special. In fact I didn't speak of the quality of finishing on the Rolex, but the completeness - there's a difference and it's clear that the Rolex 3135 is more completely finished that the GS movement is. I only offered the photos I did as way of illustrating that when people refer to the outstanding finishing of GS watches, that applies only to the exterior of the watch, and the interior is certainly nothing special in that regard. In fact the link to the PSM page you provided, he says this when speaking about the movement:
"Although the overall finishing could be improved, the resulting calibre combines vintage solidity in construction with modern manufacturing techniques and alloys effectively."
From the standpoint of the dial, hands, and case, they certainly do great finishing, but the movements are simply mediocre at best, and not as completely finished as other mid-tier brands are. If you believe differently then we can agree to disagree.
Cheers, Al
Click to expand...