Forums Latest Members
  1. ConElPueblo Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,977
    Uniqez likes this.
  2. bubba48 Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    1,546
    Likes
    7,866
    Speaking in general, what's wrong in a non-lume dial with lumed hands? . It's quite common.
    I think the opposite is wrong.
     
  3. kreyke Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    626
    Likes
    838
    Wow that's a unique dial.
     
  4. Rumar89 Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    810
    Likes
    1,599
    That dial immediately made me this of this:

    IMG_0513.JPG
     
  5. ConElPueblo Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,977
    I struggle to think of any Omega references with lumefilled hands and none on the dial. It is one of the few rules of thumb concerning Omega, IMO.
     
  6. ConElPueblo Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    9,587
    Likes
    26,977
    Only just noticed how the 6 o'clock marker has been (re)attached somewhat nonchalantly ::facepalm2::

    [​IMG]
     
  7. X350 XJR Vintage Omega Aficionado Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    12,591
    Likes
    29,841
    Hands are short for this dial and the movement has the wrong regulator, 354 should be swans neck.

    s-l1600.jpg s-l1600-1.jpg
     
  8. bubba48 Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    1,546
    Likes
    7,866
    Thanks. I learned something new about Omega. ;-)
     
  9. Hijak Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    7,225
    Likes
    24,337
    I believe that bumper is from a cal. 352 chronometer as well.:(
     
  10. Rumar89 Jun 20, 2017

    Posts
    810
    Likes
    1,599
    Is the bridge a separate color or is that just a trick of the light?