Forums Latest Members
  1. Jamsh Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    5
    Following on from my 1st post in the Introductions section, I have now had the back opened and here are the pictures .
    Hope this is enough detail to identify my watch.
     
    IMG_0046.JPG IMG_0047.JPG
  2. Pvt-Public Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    2,308
    Likes
    3,091
  3. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    Not all 354 were chronometers. From the OVD:
    • Other Cal. 351 Created in 1949, 17 jewels Cal. 354 Created in 1952, 17 jewels Both with central sweep-second hand and some of them with chronometer cert
    Honestly, better photos would help but I think the reference is a 2577, as @BenBagbag said in your other thread. It's a Seamaster with a cal. 354 bumper movement from the early 1950's.
     
  4. Dan S Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    18,798
    Likes
    43,238
    Why no photos of the dial? Are we supposed to search through your previous posts to find them?
     
  5. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    Yes. It took me all of about 2 seconds. Here, I'll save you the trouble.
    [​IMG]
     
    Dan S likes this.
  6. Dan S Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    18,798
    Likes
    43,238
    It's the principle of the thing. :)
     
  7. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. I'm just happy that he bothered to post any photos.
     
    Nathan1967 and Dan S like this.
  8. Dan S Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    18,798
    Likes
    43,238
    Who are you, and what have you done with the @efauser I've come to know? :D
     
    Nathan1967 likes this.
  9. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,232
    I was wondering the same thing, when I read my post.
     
    Nathan1967 and Vicke like this.
  10. michael22 Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    1,790
    Likes
    1,897
    An out of body experience.:)
     
  11. Jamsh Sep 6, 2018

    Posts
    6
    Likes
    5
    Sorry about the quality of the photographs. Thanks for the information.