Identification

Posts
2
Likes
0
Hello everyone, I have had this Omega for a while now, can anyone please tell me anything about it and if it’s collectible.
Many thanks
Austin
 
Posts
328
Likes
441
Hello everyone, I have had this Omega for a while now, can anyone please tell me anything about it and if it’s collectible.
Many thanks
Austin

Looks like a recent amateur redial to me, for example note that the applied 10 o’clock hour marker does not match up with the printed/painted 10 o’clock line. Other details either don’t line up or aren’t true to the original, and of course there’s the fact that the surface looks far too fresh. As always, others here will be able to give more definitive opinions.
 
Posts
7,915
Likes
35,898
You have a 1950's Constellation with a waffle dial. In original condition it would be very collectible, unfortunately yours has had a re-dial which greatly reduces it's desirability amongst collectors.
 
Posts
18,206
Likes
27,542
I’m not 100% sure it’s a redial. The hour markers look like it’s the angle of the shot that makes them look not aligned.
 
Posts
6,320
Likes
9,762
I’m not 100% sure it’s a redial. The hour markers look like it’s the angle of the shot that makes them look not aligned.

Welcome @Austin20
Sometimes the angle of the photo can suggest misalignment but in this case as the others have said, unfortunately, your watch has had the dial repainted.
(The fonts aren’t quite right and Constellations always have continuous crosshairs)
It does affect the desirability for collectors but doesn’t stop you wearing and enjoying the watch.
 
Posts
10,451
Likes
16,345
I’m not 100% sure it’s a redial. The hour markers look like it’s the angle of the shot that makes them look not aligned.
Look closely at the Automatic etc script. The irregularity says redial to me. It’s a nice job and probably looks good with the naked eye but I am fairly certain the text has been done by hand.
 
Posts
365
Likes
453
The logo is misplaced, the hands are tampered with and it´s a redial. The dial has no patina.
More opinions?
 
Posts
262
Likes
108
The swiss made text does not look true to the original.
 
Posts
358
Likes
404
The word AUTOMATIC looks as if it is running up hill. Especially, the MATIC. Maybe caused by refraction from the crystal, bu I doubt it. The UTO in AUTO look lighter in color as well. I would guess re-dial.
 
Posts
5,525
Likes
9,444
The logo is misplaced, the hands are tampered with and it´s a redial. The dial has no patina.
More opinions?
Gold plating has worn off the top two lugs (either that, or there is some serious, serious cheese)
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,962
Hello everyone, I have had this Omega for a while now, can anyone please tell me anything about it and if it’s collectible.
Many thanks
Austin
As noted, it's a 1950s model, either reference 2782 or 2852 (identified inside the case), with the dial refinished, most likely due to being heavily degraded, and has lost its collectibility value. It's a nice looking re-dial, however, and if you wear it, without close examination, you'll likely never meet anyone who knows the difference though.