I need your opinion on this "Omega vintage Seamaster BIG size", Thanks!

Posts
240
Likes
1,838
looks good,price think is fair.
Some tritium on the indexes at the dial are missing.
Buckle is new (made after 1990).
 
Posts
98
Likes
119
Dial looks good to me. Very nice piece, in my opinion. Love the coat hanger “S”
 
Posts
6
Likes
0
Dial looks good to me. Very nice piece, in my opinion. Love the coat hanger “S”
Thanks, for reply!
 
Posts
7,538
Likes
34,608
I'm not sure how 35mm could be called 'big', I'd more describe it in the context of a 1960's dress watch as 'standard' or 'normal'.

I don't like the dial which has some quite prominent and unattractive staining. I'd pass.
Edited:
 
Posts
6
Likes
0
looks good,price think is fair.
Some tritium on the indexes at the dial are missing.
Buckle is new (made after 1990).
I noticed some dots missing, but for the age of the watch I assume it is OK.
 
Posts
6
Likes
0
I'm not sure how 35mm could be called 'big', I'd more describe it in the context of a 1960's dress watch as 'standard' or 'normal'.

I don't like the dial which has some quite prominent and unattractive staining. I'd pass.
Thanks for reply, would please elaborate by saying "quite prominent and unattractive staining" I am kind of new with vintage watch, but this is unnatural patina by causing water damage or those stains are normal for over 50 years old watch, thanks for answering!
 
Posts
7,754
Likes
26,941
There are many, many Seamasters circulating in the market with cleaner, more attractive dials. Of course only a subset will be of this particular reference, but choosing the one linked would seem an odd decision given how many better examples are available.
 
Posts
6
Likes
0
There are many, many Seamasters circulating in the market with cleaner, more attractive dials. Of course only a subset will be of this particular reference, but choosing the one linked would seem an odd decision given how many better examples are available.
Got it, Thanks!