I avoid redone dials like most, but I make an exceptions for particularly rare pieces,

Posts
396
Likes
700
and a plank dial Seamster Chronometer qualifies. I think this was pretty well done, but would appreciate comments from the experts and also about the 1,5,7, and 11 markers.

 
Posts
97
Likes
94
Personally, everything else considered, the position and alignment of the 3 hours marking would make me mad every time I look at the watch...
 
Posts
2,085
Likes
4,389
+1

on top: As beautiful as these indexes (and gilt/black) are, they make little sense and would be too inharmonious for me.
 
Posts
3,318
Likes
7,037
and a plank dial Seamster Chronometer qualifies. I think this was pretty well done, but would appreciate comments from the experts and also about the 1,5,7, and 11 markers.


I am with you when it comes to redone dials. I also try to avoid them but accept them on rare models or with very uncommon dial designs.
But we must accept that most collectors frown upon redone dials and that a reprinted dial ruins the collectability and value of the watch.
However an interesting dial design (even when restored) can give a lot of pleasure when worn on a watch as a daily companion. I understand why you like this particular dial.
But what I would correct asap:
The misaligned marker at 3 can be set straight - it stands out like a sore thumb
And the hands should be replaced because
1) the seconds hand is way too short
2) the minute hand is also a tad short and it looks as if it missed the facets - at least in the photo it looks flat.
3) the hour hand has lost some of it´s plating at the tip or it is heavy corrosion...
Source a nice play of hands and you have a watch you can enjoy despite of the restored dial.
 
Posts
2,466
Likes
2,840
If 2,4,8,10 indices have a lume spot, I guess a lumed hand set could make things less wrong

Is it 100% it's a redial? With no reference what was the tell? T markings on a pre-T watch?
 
Posts
12,524
Likes
16,876
Not loving this one. It almost certainly wasn’t black to start. Fonts are not close. The issue with the “T’s” has been mentioned. I think the dial markers are OK. Norman Morris did some very strange stuff here in the USA.

If the watch was super cheap, then OK. It’s a pretty rare variation. Otherwise, I’d run the other way from this one.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
1,922
Likes
1,177
I accepted all refinished dial as many avoid them and I have them refinished again anyways.

don’t buy anymore though
 
Posts
167
Likes
291
Perhaps exaggerated due to not being a head on shot…. But is anyone else bothered by the omega symbol not being centered on the vertical line?
 
Posts
60
Likes
63
Perhaps exaggerated due to not being a head on shot…. But is anyone else bothered by the omega symbol not being centered on the vertical line?
I was starting to think that I was the only one who noticed that. Is the applied "OMEGA" cartouche also wonky with respect to the printed "AUTOMATIC"? Again it could be the angle of the shot.

None of it really matters in the face of the 3 o'clock marker's misalignment to the crosshair though.
 
Posts
1,541
Likes
12,064
It took a while but it’s well worth waiting for an original.

Not Seamaster but close enough 😁
 
Posts
396
Likes
700
I am with you when it comes to redone dials. I also try to avoid them but accept them on rare models or with very uncommon dial designs.
But we must accept that most collectors frown upon redone dials and that a reprinted dial ruins the collectability and value of the watch.
However an interesting dial design (even when restored) can give a lot of pleasure when worn on a watch as a daily companion. I understand why you like this particular dial.
But what I would correct asap:
The misaligned marker at 3 can be set straight - it stands out like a sore thumb
And the hands should be replaced because
1) the seconds hand is way too short
2) the minute hand is also a tad short and it looks as if it missed the facets - at least in the photo it looks flat.
3) the hour hand has lost some of it´s plating at the tip or it is heavy corrosion...
Source a nice play of hands and you have a watch you can enjoy despite of the restored dial.

Excellent suggestions, and not surprising considering the source😀. The second hand has the tip broken off, but while they should be replaced, I believe all are original to the watch.
 
Posts
396
Likes
700
Not loving this one. It almost certainly wasn’t black to start. Fonts are not close. The issue with the “T’s” has been mentioned. I think the dial markers are OK. Norman Morris did some very strange stuff here in the USA.

If the watch was super cheap, then OK. It’s a pretty rare variation. Otherwise, I’d run the other way from this one.
gatorcpa

The dial was black when I bought it, but it is possible it had been redone by prior owner. I try hard not to buy anything I don't consider a bargain😀. This one, including cost of redial, was under $1k.