Forums Latest Members
  1. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,789
    There is nothing wrong with the content of the original post in this thread. After that there were few misunderstands on misunderstandings, with a pinch of the usual Omega Forums sarcasm (famous the world over) thrown in to muddy the soup.

    You may now continue with normal banter
     
    John R Smith likes this.
  2. Difeer Apr 21, 2015

    Posts
    238
    Likes
    320
    I think the guys have already mentioned that the case, dial and caseback seems right. You will need to check the movement as well.

    The phrase "original condition" can be misleading as it can mean having the original parts or being in the condition in which the watch originally came. I think the best thing to do is to be as specific as possible in your description of the watch without resorting to using such general descriptions. Describe the case, dial, movement etc separately.
     
    dsio likes this.
  3. Gstp Apr 22, 2015

    Posts
    468
    Likes
    1,928
    Thanks. I will add a picture of the movement later
     
  4. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Apr 22, 2015

    Posts
    16,346
    Likes
    44,891
    Event horizon and styggpyggeno1 like this.