I haven't yet, but would.
Sm300 165.024 and 166.024 I would buy multiples of
because I think they are underpriced. Looking.

 

I'll keep that in mind. I just don't feel comfortable
with my knowledge level of the early ones yet.

 

My favorite Omega is the early, steel-cased Genève in the larger (36mm) case, and coincidentally, it is the only model in my eclectic collection that I've doubled up on!

 

Purchase? Sure! But I don't I've ever owned 2 identical models at the same time. It happens when I flip something and regret it so I track down another.

 

I'm also a big early SM 300 fan... now looking for a decent example of a 165.014

 

I've got the same OCD streak I think



Although the one on the right has now departed.

 

It's CDO, in alpha-freakin'-betical order dammit! ( )

 

Omg i'm normal - well almost

I'll crawl out of the closet and admit 2 x SM300

 

Not yet, but i would for all sorts of reasons. But i suspect for most of us, there's so many watches and so little time that there's usually something we want more...

 

No kidding! I spent about 2 years trying different watch styles to see what I liked. Now I'm working my way up the ladder.

 

Respectable Member pitpro

Likewise, given the chance I would also like to keep multiple examples of the SM 300 diver watch. However, to get an authentic one is not easy, since most of them have been 'improved', over time. It is far more attractive than the Submariners in term of looks. Definitely a good one is grossly under-priced, relative to the Submariners'.

Thank-you.

 

Not Omegas, but... I have a problem.

Twins:








Quadruplets:



And these are pretty close:

 

Nolo contendere

 

Not yet at that stage mike .......at least variation in dial or case is needed for me to justify my purchase.
However I will make exception on Connie arrowhead marker..........SS or gold

 

Mike, you can't be as bad as Mike Wood, can you?
Title of his post was "Should I retire at 65"