How’s my eye developing?

norb1967

Without looking at anything other than the word ‘automatic’ it’s possible to see this is a redial; the font is all wrong. Also notice the fact that each line of text is a slightly different font size.

If you look at enough examples of genuine ones you spot them immediately.

Peemacgee

The font is all over the place - so you were right to doubt the dial.
However, the first thing to ring alarm bells should be the hands reaching to the edge of the dial, while the minute haches are in between the indices.
This looks like a dome dial, repainted to look like a two tone dial with pie-pan characteristics

BTW the case is a Dennison, British made, case, which already makes it less collectible to some, so it might not exactly conform to a particular Swiss case reference (note the pronounced shadow gap between bezel and lugs) plus it is quite heavily polished.
Mind you, there will be a significant amount of gold in that case as the Dennison cases were very well made and equal in weight to the Swiss cases.

Engee

Thanks for this, and everyone who has pointed stuff out.
My ignorance about the reference meant I didn’t know there should be no gap between bezel and lugs.
Also, thank you for the heads up about the collectibility of Dennison Cases. I thought they were liked because they are well made good quality cases with a strong heritage with Omega. As a Brit the likelihood is that most gold cases I come 1cross are likely to be Dennison so this is something for me to think about.