Hi guys, Could some of the more experienced guys have a look at this Omega Seamaster 300 166024 dial. Does everything look okay? Thanks indeed!
Can i ask why? There is that dial type as well in this model... T Swiss made T Do you meant that is not original?
to me . it looks like hour markers are showing , tiny indices lines, behind the 2, 5 and 9 markers. these should not be there
I can see what you refer to @billythekid But it looks more like dust than markers. They are pretty off center...
I'm no expert, but I see the same "stubbies" behind 2,5,8 and 9. The presence of one might be dismissed as dust, but seeing four makes me prefer to view this one in person, through a loupe, before spending money on it...
I think the dial is ok on the one pic it makes the impression there are "stubbies" To be 100% sure I would recommend to share some focused close up shots of the 2,5,8 & 9 o clock areas
Looks fine apart from what looks like stubbies (as has been said before) in the first photo. If it's a snider, its getting really scary out there.
Thanks for your comments. I'll check the dial for the stubbies but I'm pretty sure they are not there. What worried me more are the missing holes in the 6 and 12 Lume plots. Some resources say they should be there and then i also read that original dials were seen without them. Can you help me here guys?
The pinholes are much less visible in the non BT dials, sometimes you can see them with a loupe. It has been stated by others that some dials are fine without them but I feel more comfortable if I can see them. Like this;