Help with conquest dial

Posts
328
Likes
441
I know more about the 1954 through 1959 version, but this looks good to me, I don’t see any red flags.
 
Posts
8,783
Likes
72,838
I think it looks fine and in my experience, Longines dials all seem to wear well
 
Posts
117
Likes
228
Hi there,
Printing quality on the dial seems excellent. However, one thing I notice is that I've never seen this reference with the q of "Conquest" crossing the o of "automatic". Can anyone chime in on whether this could be font variation?

For reference, this one was sold on OF:
[https://omegaforums.net/threads/all...-automatic-ref-7171-3-cal-291-serviced.64540/]

PS: I think it could be the angles, but the lume plot at 6 seems slightly off-center?
 
Posts
3,903
Likes
42,981
Hi there,
Printing quality on the dial seems excellent. However, one thing I notice is that I've never seen this reference with the q of "Conquest" crossing the o of "automatic". Can anyone chime in on whether this could be font variation?

For reference, this one was sold on OF:
[https://omegaforums.net/threads/all...-automatic-ref-7171-3-cal-291-serviced.64540/]

PS: I think it could be the angles, but the lume plot at 6 seems slightly off-center?
Agree with you... Though, I'm more into the 50s ones.
I'll tend to say it is a redial. The conquest font seems too thin, and the Longines too thick...

And as pointed out, the 6 o'clock and also the 1 o'clock lime plots are not aligned. I checked the other pictures, and seems out of lines in different angles.

Other more seasoned members, much more clever than me, will surely better assess it
 
Posts
3,903
Likes
42,981
Oh well about that one....
Got an offer for it, after some discussion on escaping Global Shipping, it's now found its way here(pictured after a spa day at my watch guy)
well done! congrats and wear it in good health 😀