Help on Seamaster 1968

Posts
9
Likes
0
hi everyone, need help
I plan to buy this one but i’m not sure about the dial.
Can anyone tell Is this dial re paint?
And also may i ask for price check on this? Thanks
 
Posts
1,554
Likes
3,651
I would say it's a redial. The hand-drown Seamaster inscription is a no no for me. And the chewing-gum lume on the dial ::facepalm1::
 
Posts
12,959
Likes
22,460
100% a redial.
Look at the thick, uneven script and hash marks along with the bright green lume dots.
 
Posts
17,618
Likes
36,846
My immediate impression is that the dial has been re-painted/re-inked, and not very well, so I agree with @Seaborg.
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
The case with the damaged gold plating looks horrible as well.

A watch to be avoided...
 
Posts
614
Likes
836
And also may i ask for price check on this? Thanks
I'll bite on the "price check".
Whatever it is, is too much!
 
Posts
4,402
Likes
5,799
Would also think that movement with serial 26M also not original...
 
Posts
328
Likes
441
Wow, The most obvious redial I’ve seen in awhile. Good on you for asking before buying (i’m assuming).
 
Posts
9
Likes
0
Would also think that movement with serial 26M also not original...

So this is not genuine movement?
 
Posts
2,078
Likes
2,837
What is the asking price?

Do you have the reference number (inside caseback)?
 
Posts
9
Likes
0
What is the asking price?

Do you have the reference number (inside caseback)?

Seller ask only for 2700 usd, And yes the ref 145.018
So hard to get info for this one, i only found deville with same ref.
 
Posts
2,078
Likes
2,837
Do an internet search for "145.018" and "omegaforums" and start reading and comparing!
 
Posts
9
Likes
0
Do an internet search for "145.018" and "omegaforums" and start reading and comparing!

already did. 145.018 ref are exist on seamaster but only in gold (once i saw on chrono 24) and that watch priced 3 times from this one.
I’m not taking this one, Thanks for remind me.
 
Posts
2,078
Likes
2,837
Would also think that movement with serial 26M also not original...

Hi John,

a 26m serial for a 145.018 sounds not so wrong for me, could you please let me know your thoughts on that?

Thanks