Forums Latest Members
  1. golfer28 Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    16
    Likes
    1
    Is this dial authentic? Looks to be in suspiciously good shape and unique?

    Thanks

    http://m.ebay.com/itm/221656859029?nav=SEARCHPurchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
     
  2. peatnick Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    23,415
    not to mention the unique caseback

    [​IMG]

    Omega VDB doesn't have 14762 but does have 14761 with geneva striped dial
    [​IMG]
     
    Edited Jan 13, 2015
  3. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,714
    Here are my quick thoughts:

    1. Dial is a redial for sure. It should say "Omega Automatic" and probably "Seamaster" as well. Geneva stripes pattern is correct for this reference.

    2. Never seen a steel Seamaster with gold medallion before. Not saying that it can't exist, only that I haven't seen it before.

    3. Hands are replacements.

    I was able to find this example from a very high-end seller for comparison:

    https://www.1stdibs.com/jewelry/wat...el-seamaster-ref-14762-circa-1961/id-j_96066/

    And another one, without the special dial:

    http://forums.watchuseek.com/f20/crowning-moment-902206.html

    I'd pass on this one.
    gatorcpa
     
    Waynepjr likes this.
  4. golfer28 Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    16
    Likes
    1
    Thanks for the quick feedback. Looking for a vintage seamaster but everything I find seems to be either very rough or looks too good to be authentic.
     
  5. golfer28 Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    16
    Likes
    1
    Is it relatively safe to assume that the dial of an automatic seamaster should say "automatic" under "omega" and "seamaster" on the dial and lacking this is a definite sign on redail? Thanks
     
  6. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,714
    On that reference, yes.

    On others? It depends.
    gatorcpa
     
  7. peatnick Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    23,415
  8. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    12,203
    Likes
    15,714
    Only difference seems to be the date feature. Also, not all examples will have that dial with the stripes. It's not unusual for there to be a dozen different dials residing in the same case.
    gatorcpa
     
  9. Stewart H Honorary NJ Resident Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    3,070
    Likes
    3,510
    A bit late to this party but here is my 14761-1 SC
    Wave 1.jpg
    Wave 2.jpg
     
    peatnick likes this.
  10. golfer28 Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    16
    Likes
    1
  11. golfer28 Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    16
    Likes
    1
    Is re-painted/re-dailed acceptable if done correctly and accurately or is it always better to avoid in favor of altered? I'm looking for a watch to wear versus collect but I don't want something that is inaccurately refurbished or a frankenstein.
     
  12. TNTwatch Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    2,876
    Likes
    1,950
    I think someone plated the medallion. Got over $700 already with an hour to go, while all-original ones are in the $500 range! :eek:
     
  13. cicindela Steve @ ΩF Staff Member Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    15,047
    Likes
    23,790
    Always better to avoid unless there are very unusual circumstances (not really present here) Hands on this are also incorrect and not Omega
     
  14. JimInOz Melbourne Australia Jan 13, 2015

    Posts
    15,489
    Likes
    32,377
    Looks like it was a very tired one to begin with.

    Some doctoring and polishing has bought it up to OC Watchco shinyness.

    Not for the collector or purist.
     
  15. Mothra Jan 14, 2015

    Posts
    1,634
    Likes
    1,111
    Mothra rushes into the kitchen to gold plate all his Seamaster medallions..... (jk)