Forums Latest Members
  1. Simonhedegaard Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    71
    Likes
    603
    So... i bought this "Ed White" in a vintage shop in Spain because of the brace that was sitting on it and the DON bezel :) I have used it as a daily beater, but a month ago i bought a all org. 145.012.67 and that won't leave my wrist ;)

    I was suggested to get a extract and i showed quite a surprise... as i understand it the movement have ben changed at some time! The movement number is 22088543 and is as you see a cal.321 but not born in this watch... Is i normal that the movement have been changed and how do it affect the watch?

    IMG_5849.JPG

    I am a bit of novice into vintage Speedmasters, but until know the knowledge i have getting due to this watch have been great! I am thou left with some questions...

    - The caseback is stamped 105.003.65 which some my think was wrong to the case (he suggested that it might be a .64 case do to the polished lugs...) What do you think? - sorry for the poor image :)

    IMG_4050.jpg

    - The dial i obviously wrong, but to which Speedmasters does it fit?

    - The chrono-hand is not correct either, does it fit to the dial or?

    - Is the other hands correct?

    - What about the pushers, the crown isn't correct i think... !?

    The watch is not for the purist so we don't have to go that way in a discussion, but i really hope to get knowledge on the watch :) I have tried speedmaster101 and there are "tons" of dial and variations, so this confused me a bit...

    IMG_5851.JPG IMG_5858.JPG IMG_5852.JPG IMG_5853.JPG IMG_5850.JPG IMG_5854.JPG IMG_5855.JPG IMG_5856.JPG IMG_5857.JPG

    // Simon
     
  2. kov Trüffelschwein. Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    Hi Simon

    I have the feeling that you have a example of a put together watch here.

    The case looks to me to be a service part, so does the crown as well as the pushers. The dial has long indexes but PROFESSIONAL so it doesn't belong to Ed Whites, rather 145.012 I'd say based on the Swiss Made marking. Hour and minutes hands look okay. Chrono hand looks vintage and tritium but rather for a 145.012 or 145.022 reference. Subdial hands may also be service parts, hard to say.

    On top of that, the movement comes from another (much cheaper) cal 321-powered reference.

    How does it affect the value? I would say heavily. You might only figure it out when you'll try to resell it yourself...

    If it was mine and if it was sold (and priced) as a 105.003, I would contact the seller and claim my money back.
     
  3. gdupree Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    902
    Likes
    1,560
    As you mentioned, it's pretty much a watch put together from a bunch of parts that did not originally belong together. Here's where some of the parts would have come from:

    - Movement: A 1965 Seamaster
    - Dial: From a 105.012, or 145.012
    - Caseback: 105.003-65
    - Hands: The chrono seconds hand is from at least 145.012 or later, but my guess would be more towards the late 70's+ from its color. No real telling about the hour and minute hands, but they're a different color than the seconds hand, so they probably weren't made together. The subdial hands do have a sharper point, with is usually seen on older speedmasters to my memory.
    - I'm not great with cases and pushers, So I believe Kov on that.

    It's a parts watch, so it's value will be in it's parts, not in it's value as a speedmaster. If you were to sell it, I imagine that's value would be better realized by selling it's parts individually.
     
  4. Simonhedegaard Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    71
    Likes
    603
    Thanks :) The seller didn't know what he had so the price wasn't at all like a normal ed white! I am not unhappy with the purchase... I was fully aware that the watch was putted together but first found out the movement wasnt from a Speedy?

    I what way does this cal.312 movement separates from a cal. 321 from a 105.003 ?
     
  5. kov Trüffelschwein. Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    It is not a 312, it is also a caliber 321 you have in your watch. I would say it's identical to a cal.321 coming from an Ed White produced as such. The only thing which is different is that Omega logged that serial number as a movement installed in a 18k solid pink gold Seamaster back in 1965 instead of an Ed White Speedmaster.

    At the end of the day, what's disturbing here is the number of things that don't belong to each other ;)
     
    Dan S, mr_yossarian and Foo2rama like this.
  6. Dgercp Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    1,072
    Likes
    1,454
    Well, there can be many theories about how this was all put together but it has a nice DON and if you like it and did not pay too much, it is a fine
    beater watch.
     
    oddboy and Simonhedegaard like this.
  7. Mr Blond Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    356
    Likes
    406
    If you come to selling it in the future you might be better off selling all the parts off separately. Still nice watch though
     
    Simonhedegaard likes this.
  8. Simonhedegaard Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    71
    Likes
    603
    Sorry, typo ;) Yes, it is a true franken watch... But that is all i "take it for" if it makes sense!
     
  9. kov Trüffelschwein. Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    4,113
    Likes
    16,085
    Makes totally sense, wear the hell out of it :thumbsup:
     
  10. Castle4444 Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    582
    Likes
    805
    Gotta be over £6000 in parts regardless
     
    felsby likes this.
  11. bgrisso Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    3,126
    Likes
    6,883
    If you didn't pay more than the sum of it's parts, enjoy it, or part it out now that you have an orig 145.012
     
  12. airansun In the shuffling madness Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    2,520
    Likes
    17,674
    Looks like a nice back and case band. Shame about the pushers.

    If you do decide to part it out, dibs on the case and, in particular, the back. I have a deserving watch! :rolleyes:

    But, yeah, you should wear the hell out of it instead. I know I would. :)

    BTW, the movement must have looked gorgeous in 18k rose gold! Mine’s yellow 14k but I’d prefer rose 18k! F98BBA63-E7CC-471E-9BE8-C004F57A4224.jpeg
     
    Edited Aug 20, 2018
    Skier, Dan S, jimmyd13 and 2 others like this.
  13. Marty McDawg Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    332
    Likes
    614

    To piggyback AnS,


    Dibs on the DON :)
     
  14. Simonhedegaard Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    71
    Likes
    603
    I think I will keep the watch for know :) and I need to debate and write here a bit more before I can sell it in here ;)
     
    Marty McDawg likes this.
  15. Marty McDawg Aug 20, 2018

    Posts
    332
    Likes
    614
    If you like the watch, you should totally wear it. The true value in a watch is the one we place on it.

    Wear it sir and make some memories, but if you decide otherwise...:thumbsup:
     
    felsby, connieseamaster and Delbok like this.
  16. Simonhedegaard Aug 21, 2018

    Posts
    71
    Likes
    603
    Is there any way I can tell if it a service case or a .64 or a .65 ?
     
  17. STANDY schizophrenic pizza orderer and watch collector Aug 21, 2018

    Posts
    16,350
    Likes
    44,920
    Just like a dog from the pound/shelter, still a good dog just won't win any dog show ribbons ;)

    Aka the "Mut speedmaster"
     
    felsby likes this.
  18. Edward53 Aug 21, 2018

    Posts
    3,127
    Likes
    5,384
    That bezel is too good to "beat". If I owned that watch I would replace it with a DNN, wear that and keep the DON in reserve for whatever the future may hold.
     
    Simonhedegaard likes this.
  19. Simonhedegaard Aug 21, 2018

    Posts
    71
    Likes
    603
    What is the value of a bezel like this? I see it as a jungle where they range from $2000-5000 !?
     
  20. mr_yossarian Aug 21, 2018

    Posts
    2,418
    Likes
    4,572
    Not 5 but not 2 either. Wait for offers.