Help ID'ing a 60's Seamaster Deville. Originality Questions.

Posts
10
Likes
0
New member, first Omega. I've been searching for a 60's Seamaster for some time, and recently picked this one up for just under $300. Seller states it as a "circa 1960" Seamaster in perfect working condition. Caseback states 168.017 SP, 562 Movement.

After some digging, it doesn't look like the crown is original, as it's smooth and doesn't have the Omega logo. Also with a serial number beginning with 185, I'm guessing this is a '61 model.

Looking for more information on this watch, i.e. originality, etc.

Thanks in advance!

-Matt

23314323601_4e0833ae87_b.jpg

23288448212_0de6ac4220_b.jpg

23101123420_20d1625be5_b.jpg

22768524224_3e8e0755f9_b.jpg

23028941279_d0203e3b5c_b.jpg
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,611
I don't think that caseback goes with the rest of the watch. That reference number goes to a Constellation C-case but may have been used on a Seamaster, although I can't find an example. The more I look at it, I have more questions than answers.
Hopefully someone more knowledgeable than me can help.
 
Posts
13,441
Likes
31,613
Its a nasty bastard made up from parts of unrelated watches.

The Seamaster DE VILLE is a front loading case, which this obviously isn't.

As noted, the case reference is also not for a Seamaster. I have doubts ANY part of the case is actually Omega.
 
Posts
10
Likes
0
Thanks for confirming what I suspected. Do the movement and dial look good and original though? I'd like to try and get a correct case and crown.
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,611
I would return it. If you got it on eBay, regardless of whether the seller has a no return policy, unless the issues were spelled out in the listing, you can get your money back because it sure as hell isn't what it was sold as. You can pick up a good one, in original condition, for less than what you'd be paying to correct it.
 
Posts
10
Likes
0
Thanks I've contacted the seller with the information gained here. I looked back at the listing and it lists the case as original, so I have grounds for a dispute.

Thanks for your help guys. I thought this watch was a pretty good price for an original watch that doesn't appear to have been redialed, but now it seems not so much...
 
Posts
10
Likes
0
So the seller has agreed to refund my money. Other than eBay, where's a good reputable watch in the same price range?
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,611
Make sure you post photos here before you close the deal, just to make sure there's nothing wrong. I would ask for movement pics, but the seller has been a member for a while so others may disagree.
 
Posts
10
Likes
0
20151111_090111_resized-jpg.171186
20151111_090144_resized-jpg.171187
20151111_090128_resized-jpg.171188
Look legit? Seller stated he lost all info for his watches in an office fire. Watch was in a safe and incurred no damage. He's reticent to open the watches up and get pics of movement/serial numbers/etc.
 
Posts
10
Likes
0
I also am looking for as much information as I can get on a Seamaster Deville (circa 1965). This watch was a family heirloom and as such I would never sell it (it was given to me by my parents who inherited it from my grandfather, it was a gift to him from my grandmother on their weddingg day - which I think was 1965 or '66). I think the crystal was replaced, Im not sure what else has been repaired or replaced.....

My questions are this:
How can I discern exact year?
Is the bracelet original?
How much of it looks replaced?
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,611
Take it to a watchmaker and have him take out the movement (it is a front loader). There's a serial number on it that you google the approximate date. There's also a reference number stamped inside the caseback. You can also google that to learn a lot about the watch.
Edited:
 
Posts
440
Likes
519
Have inherited a similar one WatchMeWin - might find some of these images helpful... It was purchased in February 1965!

Thats a very nice piece. I love those beaded bracelets