Help Identifying Vintage Seamaster

Posts
54
Likes
22
Hi Omega Forums, could I get your kind insight on this seamaster, it was owned by someone close who recently passed on. I am hoping I can get it to a better condition so that it can be returned to his immediate family as a remembrance. I found some pretty similar references after some searching, the closest being this, but it's still not an exact match.

Some observations that I noted:
1. There's no reference or serial number engraved anywhere on the case.
2. There is "11" (I think) engraved on the right side of both endlinks
3. On the dial, Applied vintage omega logo, and the words "Omega Automatic" at 12 oclock; "Swiss" at 6 o'clock
4. The minute and hour hands had a thin strip of lume in the middle, which has now turned black due to age (tritium?)
5. The omega logo on the crystal is there, its obscured by scratches and hard to see from the pictures - but it is there. Does this serve as a sign of authenticity?
6. Crown has vintage omega logo too
7. Comes with a beads of rice (I think?) bracelet and folding clasp has omega logo as well. I have no idea if thi is the original bracelet or aftermarket.
8. I have no box, no papers, no idea of its authenticity, service history, or how much its been worn, but it does look pretty beat up. The crystal seems to be plastic or hesalite, could I remove the scratches with polywatch?

I guess what I really need help with is:
1. Is this an authentic omega? Does anyone now the specific year and reference number of this?
2. Are the parts for this watch still available, are there still watchmakers servicing this? Or would Omega service center be able to take it up?
3. What would the value of this be? Not that I'm looking to sell it, but this could help me gauge how much I should be spending on to have it serviced or restored.

Thank you so much in advance. This would mean a lot to me and the bereaved family.

 
Posts
21,162
Likes
48,289
Could be a 165.009. Looks all legit. Well-worn, crazed crystal, some modification to endlinks. Sorry, I didn't read your whole post if you had specific questions.
 
Posts
21,162
Likes
48,289
Sorry, the dial has been refinished. I didn't look closely at first. Kills the value.
 
Posts
54
Likes
22
Thank you Dan, does that mean it has been painted over, or is it a non-authentic dial?
Also when i type165.009 into the search engine, there are a lot of different dials and hands in the results - does this reference come in many different variants back in the day?
 
Posts
21,162
Likes
48,289
It looks like a legit dial that was repainted. When you have looked at a lot of dials, you can quickly recognize printing that doesn't match the original.

Yes, most references came with many dial / handset combinations.
 
Posts
1,465
Likes
6,332
Definitely not kosher to me. Automatic is spelled wrong and how is it we can see the second A in AUTOMATC through the seconds hand in the first picture?
 
Posts
36
Likes
85
How does one misspell 'automatic' when making a watch dial?

The S in Seamaster also looks way off.

 
Posts
54
Likes
22
Definitely not kosher to me. Automatic is spelled wrong and how is it we can see the second A in AUTOMATC through the seconds hand in the first picture?
oh gosh, you're right..how could I miss such a glaring mistake.

for the second A, i have no idea..perhaps its one of those AI image processing things from my apple phone..

IS there any chance a replacement dial could be sourced?