American market reference G6250 early to mid 1950s, caliber 354 (351 possibly).
Case maker, L&K - Lutringer & Kammerer.
There were many different dials offered on this reference so finding an exact match may not be possible.
If you intend to wear it have it serviced.
American market reference G6250 early to mid 1950s, caliber 354 (351 possibly).
Case maker, L&K - Lutringer & Kammerer.
There were many different dials offered on this reference so finding an exact match may not be possible.
If you intend to wear it have it serviced.
Do you think the hands are original? I am still trying to figure out which of these Seamasters came with leaf hands..
I know basically nothing about Omega or about Seamasters but from a stylistic viewpoint those leaf hands are completely consistent with the Breguet numerals on the dial and the square-ish 1940s style indexes, they look perfect with them.
In fact I find the 1950s “pointy” hands (whatever their official name is) only work when combined with “pointy” 1950s style indexes (whatever their name is).
That’s a completely subjective view point though, entirely unsupported and just based on a general observation of vairous brands and styles over time.
I know basically nothing about Omega or about Seamasters but from a stylistic viewpoint those leaf hands are completely consistent with the Breguet numerals on the dial and the square-ish 1940s style indexes, they look perfect with them.
In fact I find the 1950s “pointy” hands (whatever their official name is) only work when combined with “pointy” 1950s style indexes (whatever their name is).
That’s a completely subjective view point though, entirely unsupported and just based on a general observation of vairous brands and styles over time.
To me the hands look wrong - as in "incorrect", not "bad". I would expect dauphine hands on a Seamaster of this era regardless of the numerals. Perhaps the US-cased Seamasters follow different rules in that regard 😀
