Forums Latest Members
  1. kranbilsattack Jun 16, 2016

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    1
    Hi,
    I have inherited an old vintage Omega and the only thing I know about it is that it's from 1952.
    received_1222191841154052.jpeg
    received_1222191687820734.jpeg
    Can someone help me find out what model it is?

    Regards
    Erik
     
    axiale likes this.
  2. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Jun 16, 2016

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
  3. kranbilsattack Jun 20, 2016

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    1
    I have opened it now and here are the pictures.
    Screenshot_20160620-180910.png received_1225029060870330.jpeg received_1225028897537013.jpeg
     
  4. Speedmasterfan88 Jun 20, 2016

    Posts
    1,294
    Likes
    4,358
    Here you'll find more Information about your watch:

    http://naligazone.com/index.php/data-watch/omega/13-watch/omega/168


    According to this the watch was introduced 1949 and was sold until 1958. the movement serial Dates this to 1952 so it's in the right range.

    The Hour indices and Hands seem to be correct but i'm Not sure about the Dial itself. Can you post higher ref pictures of the Dial? What happened to the sub Second Dial ? Something Is off there...

    Kind regards,

    Max
     
  5. kranbilsattack Jun 20, 2016

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    1
    DSC_0175.JPG DSC_0174.JPG I have had service made on it and the watchmaker said that the glass had broken down in the bottom right corner and that the watch was rusty inside and that the dial probably got moisten damaged. That's why the sub second looks a little strange.
     
  6. Willem023 Jun 20, 2016

    Posts
    883
    Likes
    1,103
    Looks like the whole top-layer of the dial has disappeared and the 5-marker has been re-attached, one floor down?
    Also seems to be some shiny stuff (glue?) sitting next to the hour-markers, although the lume does look original (colored...) on all but the 5.

    Guessing here as well as speculating (so I will deny in public :D) : the hour makers were loosened and then placed back, 5-o'clock first. Then it appeared that this glue was actually eating into the dial?
    Again, people will hang me for speculating like this, but I have never seen this before. Can water do this ::confused2::::confused2:: and so locally?

    Calling for @Archer and please excuse me if I stir something up that has a very reasonable explanation.
    Very much willing to learn.
     
  7. kingsrider Thank you Sir! May I have another? Jun 20, 2016

    Posts
    2,689
    Likes
    5,431
    It's a hot mess... dial that is. Movement looks good, and I am a fan of larger diameter watches such as this.
    Since it is an heirloom piece, seek a good watchmaker and a redial. Some dials with that ref# indicate a step sub-dial?.
    1952.jpg
     
  8. Willem023 Jun 20, 2016

    Posts
    883
    Likes
    1,103
    Good and sound advice.
    Afraid I was too shocked to give any advice at all.....
     
  9. kranbilsattack Jun 21, 2016

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    1
    Yeah I will look into a redial sometime later on.
    Also, when I'm searching photos of this ref I don't find a black dial with the cross sub dial anywhere.. is it rare or am I not searching good enough?
     
  10. fjf Jun 21, 2016

    Posts
    766
    Likes
    743
  11. efauser I ♥ karma!!! Jun 21, 2016

    Posts
    8,661
    Likes
    14,233
  12. kranbilsattack Jun 21, 2016

    Posts
    5
    Likes
    1
    Exactly. Seems like the cross sub dial is more common on white dials and such.
     
  13. fjf Jun 21, 2016

    Posts
    766
    Likes
    743
    Yep.
     
    Edited Jun 23, 2016
  14. fjf Jun 23, 2016

    Posts
    766
    Likes
    743
    Looking for this reference in this post I found one, liked it, placed a bid and ¡won!. Seller's pic:

    [​IMG]
     
    ahartfie, SteveZ28 and kingsrider like this.