My turn to resurrect this thread:
I recently got a Combat 42 with factory bracelet.
View attachment 1568425
It’s a nice watch albeit wears a touch large for my taste. But it’s incredibly slim for a diver and comfortable on the wrist.
The size is only exacerbated by the massive chunk of steel they provide as a bracelet- 22/20 taper and probably about 4mm thick- it’s like a cuff. It is actually nicely made and the ratcheted clasp is a nice touch (perhaps this is revised over the older ones as this is light years better than what Seiko provides with watches at a similar price point), but it’s massive size is a deal breaker for me. I am hoping that a slimmer more tapered bracelet (22/18 or 22/16 ideally) may help make the watch wear smaller.
I am a bracelet guy if I can help it and I don’t do strait generic endlinks- fitted or bust!
I see that Uncle Seiko does 22mm fitted endlinks for several Seiko models and the lug shape and cut-out are similar (kind of strait but with a slight inverse curve). I am used to vintage bracelets which are light and not great fitting to the case, but close enough (can’t be too anal retentive with vintage bracelets).
The factory Glycine fitted endlinks have the same cut-out for the center link as a Rolex oyster, but when I tried a generic 20mm oyster, the center link was about .5-1mm too short to align with the holes for the spring bars (it was sooo close and would have been awesome).
Has anyone experimented with these US or other bracelets on a Glycine sub yet?
Click to expand...