Forums Latest Members
  1. sba2222 Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    78
    Likes
    5
    Hi Guys!

    I have narrowed down to two options for watches that I like, but I need some help to see if they are good choices, and if one is better than the other.

    I appreciate any advice I receive!

    The first one is an: Omega 14K Automatic 1949 $1595
    Cal. 342 17 jewels, said to be all original and in great condition.

    The second one is an: Omega Seamaster 120 1968 $1695
    Cal.565 24 jewels, said to be in 'mint condition' and just serviced recently.

    I tried to find a nice constellation, but all of the ones I found have 'adjusted' chronometers, should I be concerned about that?
     
    1759-712-500x500.jpg 1759-712g-500x500.jpg 2165-614-500x500.jpg 2165-614d-500x500.jpg 2165-614h-500x500.jpg
  2. Mouse_at_Large still immune to Speedmaster attraction Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    2,018
    Likes
    5,257
    My personal preference would be the 120, but not based on the low res photos which possibly conceal more than they reveal.
     
  3. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    First watch is very nice, but overpriced. Should be about $1,000, maybe a little less.

    Second watch is considered more collectible, but has no intrinsic value like the gold one. Dial looks very worn. Price would be good if condition was better.

    Hope this helps,
    gatorcpa
     
  4. ahsposo Most fun screen name at ΩF Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    3,745
    Likes
    19,992
    I might be wrong, I often am according to my wife, but I would be more concerned about an unadjusted chronometer.
     
    ConElPueblo likes this.
  5. Davidt Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    10,399
    Likes
    18,075
    Those are two very different watches.

    Are you sure you e spent long enough actually deciding which model you want?
     
  6. sba2222 Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    78
    Likes
    5
    Honestly, I am thinking about this all the time. My absolute ideal is a speedmaster pro, but I have come to terms with the fact that I cannot afford that at this time, so I will save it as a gift for a later time.

    Besides that, I just want something that is special, and that my bf (who I'm buying this for) will know that the watch is special. I like the idea of buying a watch that has solid or capped Gold, because at the end of the day gold is always valuable. But I feel like something like a seamaster 120 is special enough that the non-gold will be ok. I am ok going with dressy or casual.
     
  7. gatorcpa ΩF InvestiGator Staff Member Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    12,194
    Likes
    15,696
    While gold capped is several times thicker than gold plated, there's not a lot of gold there.

    Forgot to mention that the crown on the gold watch is incorrect, although there are a lot of Omega Constellation collectors who would be happy to take it off your hands.
    gatorcpa
     
  8. kyle L Grasshopper Staff Member Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    4,417
    Likes
    11,222
    I would want better pictures of the first one and a picture of the movement/caseback to make sure it is correct. The second Seamaster I would pass on - for that price you should be able to find a nicer example.
     
  9. Kja Oct 23, 2015

    Posts
    538
    Likes
    511
    You should beable to find a really nice pie pan for that price.
     
  10. Peemacgee Purrrr-veyor of luxury cat box loungers Oct 24, 2015

    Posts
    5,148
    Likes
    7,863
    All Connies are 'adjusted' for accuracy in different positions
    This is a very good thing
    There are Omegas with 'unadjusted ' on the movement - I think this is something to do with US imports (others will confirm or otherwise explain)
    The gold cap on a watch has little intrinsic (scrap) value - but does make the watch look special.
    Stainless steel Omegas are still very special and can be equally collectible as their gold cousins