Forums Latest Members
  1. bama2141 Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    560
    Likes
    1,239
    Can anyone tell me the range of amplitudes that would be approprite for a vintage 861 movement? If I set my timegrapher for a lift angle of 40 degrees, I'm seeing a range of 220 to 250 degrees depending on orientation. Rate measurements look good and steady ranging from 2 to 6 sec/day, and beat error is very low. Seems pretty good to me, but looking for a more informed opinion.

    Thanks! --- and of course a photo:

    IMG_4232.JPG
     
  2. Canuck Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    13,463
    Likes
    37,945
  3. bama2141 Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    560
    Likes
    1,239
    Now I’m really confused — this lists the 861 lift angle at 50 degrees. Everything I’ve seen previously said 40. Can’t open the referenced spreadsheet on my phone - I’ll try later. Does it specify amplitudes?

    Thanks!
     
  4. BlackTalon This Space for Rent Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    5,177
    Likes
    8,374
    Deafboy likes this.
  5. Deafboy His Holiness Puer Surdus Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    2,178
    Likes
    6,142
    40 degrees does sound low for a modern movement. Maybe Al @Archer can chime in...
     
  6. wsfarrell Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    2,440
    Likes
    4,130
    Here's something fairly comprehensive from WUS.
     
    Deafboy likes this.
  7. dougiedude Carpe horologium! Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    7,152
    Likes
    74,083
    LA of 50 deg. Sounds right. Once you change your Timegrapher to the 50 LA setting, you’ll get much better numbers, prob ~+70 deg., which would be c/w a healthy 861 :thumbsup:!
     
  8. ChrisN Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    2,218
    Likes
    4,756
    It is 50 degrees for these.
    Screenshot_20171222-174943.jpg
    Regards, Chris
     
  9. bama2141 Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    560
    Likes
    1,239
    Thanks all for the correction! I’ll use 50 degrees
     
  10. maxbelg Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    491
    Likes
    595
    40 Degrees is correct for the 321 Omega movement, so I guess that's where you got that number?
     
    Foo2rama likes this.
  11. bama2141 Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    560
    Likes
    1,239
    Exactly — I mistakenly assumed the 861, as a derivative of the 321, would have the same lift angle. Glad to be corrected - my timegrapher readings will now look a lot better!
     
  12. bama2141 Dec 22, 2017

    Posts
    560
    Likes
    1,239
    The thread on WUS is very useful — thanks for that. Great writeup by Archer in it. I’ll need to bookmark that one.