Head-To-Head: Omega Speedmaster 60th Anniversary Vs. Speedmaster Calibre 321

Indecisive people! Frustrating.

But I really can’t pick, so that’s me right now.

The 321 Ed white edition is really the modern pinnacle and it should, on paper, take this. But I love the ck2915 re-edition. It’s like no other speedy since the watch it copies. I love it’s look and feel on the wrist. I know it will untimely loose out with its faux patina and that it doesn’t have a beautifully finished 321 underneath. But still, both incredible watches.

Now I wish omega would remake the cosmic triple. It’s been 2 years of looking for one in gold and without a modernised refinished dial.

"In my opinion, both models are closer to their source material than the FOiS is to the original Speedmaster reference CK2998."

...sounds like the next 321 speedmaster could be a true tribute to the 2998...

"Unlike the 60th anniversary, the Calibre 321 has slotted neatly into my daily rotation. It has little to do with the case size or shape (as that’s more or less identical to the 60th), but more to do with the bracelet."

...amen...and also why I hunted a vintage mint flatlink for my 60th (it does deserve it, despite the lack of love from most)...



IMHO, the perfect combo (but it would be nice, and not trying to sound like an ungrateful narcissist, if Omega could 'fix' that...for the purists...despite the great work of FB and UncleSeiko)...